[WORK SESSION - 6:30 PM]
          [00:00:12]
          AND THE TIME IS 6:30 P.M. AT QUORUM. WE'RE MISSING A JOJO. YEAH. OKAY. YEAH. FIRST READING OF S DC PROJECTS. KURT. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR PRO TEM AND COUNCIL. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME TONIGHT. WE HAD A FEW DIFFERENT PROJECTS THAT WERE APPROVED AT THE PREVIOUS EDC MEETING. AND SO I'LL GO AHEAD AND READ THESE. AND THEN DURING THE REGULAR SESSION I CAN TALK ABOUT EACH OF THEM. FIRST READING OF AC DC PROJECTS DISCUSS RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DC BUDGET AS ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1ST, 2026 AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30TH, 2027. ITEM B DISCUSS RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AC DC CONTRACT WITH TEXAS LAKE WALLS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $400,000, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE ALL NECESSARY AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. ITEM C DISCUSS RESOLUTION APPROVING AN SEDC ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT WITH ONWARD SUB SEAGOVILLE, LLC, AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $120,000 FOR NECESSARY SITE IMPROVEMENTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO TAKE TAKE FURTHER ACTION AND SIGN SUCH DOCUMENTS AS NECESSARY FOR SAID AGREEMENT. ITEM D DISCUSS A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND RATIFYING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S EXECUTION OF AN SCDC CONTRACT WITH PERFECT FINISH LANDSCAPING IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $7,500 ANNUALLY, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE ALL NECESSARY AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THIS ITEM WILL BE DISCUSSED AT THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING. BUDGET WORKSHOP, JULY THE 27TH. OKAY. WE HAVE A PRESENTATION ITEM THREE. COUNCIL CITY MANAGER TONIGHT. I'M HERE IN REGARDS TO AN INTERSECTION AT OAKBROOK AND ROSS LANE. COUNCIL MEMBER RICK HOWARD BROUGHT IT UP A COUNCIL COUPLE COUNCIL MEETINGS AGO. WE TALKED TO VICTORIA ABOUT IT AND WE HAVE TO DO A TRAFFIC STUDY ON IT IN ORDER TO CREATE IT A FOUR WAY STOP, SINCE IT'S CURRENTLY A TWO WAY STOP. AND I DID SPEAK TO THE ENGINEERS AND THEY'RE SAYING IT'S GOING TO BE BETWEEN 5 AND $10,000 TO DO THE TRAFFIC STUDY ON IT. I DO HAVE A FEW PICTURES, I BELIEVE HERE OF THE INTERSECTION. AND TODAY THESE PICTURES ARE FROM TODAY AND THIS TRAILER WAS ILLEGALLY PARKED THERE. IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE 15 FOOT FROM THE INTERSECTION. AND IF YOU CAME OFF OF THE ALLEYWAY THERE TO THE INTERSECTION, IT WAS HARD TO SEE TO THE LEFT. SO I'M SURE IN THE EVENINGS AND THE OTHER HOURS, IT'S THE SAME THING ON ALL FOUR SIDES. CITY COUNCIL HAVE ANYTHING TO DISCUSS ON IT? HOPEFULLY WE CAN SEE THE PICTURES. MAYBE. NOT WANTING TO SHOW IT TO THEM RIGHT HERE. SO THAT'S LOOKING TOWARDS MALLOY THERE. AND LIKE I SAID, THAT TRUCK AND TRAILER WAS PARKED IN THE ALLEY. THE PART THAT LED TO THE ALLEY BEHIND THE HOUSES ON ROSS AND THEN OAK OAKBROOK WOULD BE TO THE LEFT THERE. AND THIS IS LOOKING BACK TOWARDS SHADY. ISN'T THAT A FOUR WAY STOP, CHRIS? IT'S A TWO WAY STOP RIGHT NOW, JUST ON OAK BROOK AND THE ALLEY LEADING OUT. 
          THERE'S NOT A STOP ON ROSS AT ALL. OKAY, SO IT'S JUST TWO STOP SIGNS. IT'S JUST TWO STOP SIGNS. OKAY, SO IF WE DO WANT TO PURSUE IT, I COULD REACH OUT. WE KIND OF WERE HOPING FOR MAYBE JUST A HEAD NOD FROM EVERYBODY. IF WE WANT TO MAKE THAT DECISION TONIGHT. LIKE I SAID, IT WAS 5 TO $10,000 FOR THE STUDY, DEPENDING ON HOW IN DETAIL THEY HAVE TO GO INTO IT. 
          AND POTENTIALLY THE STUDY MAY SAY THAT WE DON'T NEED A FOUR WAY STOP THERE TO. THANK YOU CHRIS. BUT THERE IS MONIES AVAILABLE IN THE BUDGET TO DO IT CURRENTLY TO. I KNOW THIS IS A CONCERN HERE. I BROUGHT UP CONCERNS ALSO. MALLOY BRIDGE. WE NEVER HAVE A DETRIMENT BECAUSE IT'S ALWAYS MONEY AND I KNOW THAT'S THE LAW. WE HAVE TO DO THOSE THINGS. SO MAYBE WE NEED TO PUT A CRITERIA ON WHAT WE ARE WILLING TO SPEND WHERE RATHER THAN SAY, NO, WE CAN'T DO IT BECAUSE IT COSTS TOO MUCH MONEY. SO WE'VE GOT THREE DIFFERENT SPEED LIMITS ON 
          [00:05:03]
MALLOY BRIDGE FROM 175 PAST ROSS. SO WELL THAT ROSS IN OAKBROOK HERE, THERE'S USUALLY A QUITE A FEW CARS PARKED RIGHT BEFORE YOU GET TO OAKBROOK ON ROSS AND OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT. 
          THEY GOT OVER THERE AND GOT A VAN THAT WAS ILLEGALLY PARKING EVERY DAY, AND THEY FINALLY GOT HIM TO MOVE. SO THAT'S HELPING. IF YOU DO GO BY THIS INTERSECTION RIGHT AFTER WE HAD THAT COUNCIL MEETING THAT YOU BROUGHT IT UP, I MARKED PINK LINES ON ALL FOUR OF THE INTERSECTIONS AT THE 15 FOOT MARK, WHICH IS WHAT THE ORDINANCE IS. AND I'VE BEEN BY THERE NUMEROUS TIMES, AND THERE'S BEEN CARS INSIDE OF THE 15 FOOT FOR SURE. SO WOULD THAT BE SOMETHING WE COULD PHYSICALLY DO IS PUT NO PARKING FROM THIS SIDE TO THE CORNER. 
          THE PROBLEM IS YOU'RE PUTTING FOUR MORE SIGNS UP THAN I MEAN, POTENTIALLY WE COULD GO TALK TO ALL THE RESIDENTS THERE AT THOSE FOUR HOMES AND EXPLAIN TO THEM THAT THEY CAN'T PARK WITHIN THE 15 FOOT OF THE INTERSECTION BASED ON ORDINANCE. AND THEN IF WE SEE IT REPORTED TO PD, BUT WE'RE PROBABLY JUST GOING TO GO ASK THEM TO MOVE THEIR CARS. COULD WE COULD WE DO SOMETHING LIKE THAT? OR WOULD YOU WOULD YOU WANT TO DO A TRAFFIC STUDY? IT'S WHATEVER OUR CITY WANTS TO DO. I WAS JUST BROUGHT UP 4 OR 5, SIX PEOPLE MENTIONED THEY ALMOST HAD ACCIDENTS THERE. AND THERE'S BEEN A FEW ACCIDENTS THERE. SO. FIRST STEP, CONTACT THE CITIZENS FIRST. AND LIKE I SAID, I DID GO TODAY AND TAKE THESE PICTURES. AND I ACTUALLY PARKED ON THE ALLEYWAY. AND WHEN I CAME OUT, LIKE IF SOMEBODY WAS COMING FROM THE OTHER WAY, I PROBABLY WOULD HAVE BEEN IN AN ACCIDENT MYSELF BECAUSE I COULD NOT SEE AT ALL TOWARDS SHADY WITH THAT TRAILER PARKED RIGHT THERE. AND THEY'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE PARKED RIGHT THERE BY THAT. NO THEY'RE NOT. YEAH. AND THAT HOUSE IS ACTUALLY HAVE LIKE PERMITS ALL ON THEIR DOORS. NOBODY'S LIVING THERE, I DON'T THINK. AND THAT WAS A ROOFING COMPANY THAT WAS PARKED THERE. I DO WANT TO REITERATE AS WELL, CHRIS DID MENTION HE DID HAVE MONEY IN THE STREET MAINTENANCE BUDGET TO, TO EMPLOY OR TO HAVE THE STUDY COMPLETED. AND SO IT'S JUST A MATTER OF IF COUNCIL WANTS TO GO IN THAT DIRECTION. BUT HE DID STATE THAT HE HAS MONEY OR AVAILABLE IN HIS STREET MAINTENANCE BUDGET. I'D LIKE TO SEE IT HAPPEN, BUT I'LL ALSO LET YOU KNOW, YOU KNOW, I MEAN, I DO THINK IT'S A GREAT IDEA TO GO AND KNOCK ON THE DOORS AND MAKE SURE PEOPLE ARE AWARE. BUT FOR THAT, THAT PARTICULAR LAW, THE PARKING WITHIN 15FT OF THE INTERSECTION, YOU DON'T HAVE TO HAVE A SIGN POSTED. IT'S A STATE LAW. AND YOU CAN YOU CAN ENFORCE IT WITHOUT A SIGN, RIGHT? SO THEY CAN JUST WRITE TICKETS FOR THAT. 
          THAT'S RIGHT. OKAY. ANYTHING ELSE ON THAT? Y'ALL WANT TO TALK TO THE NEIGHBORS? GET THE STUDY? NO. CAN WE GET JUST A LITTLE HEAD NOD OR SOMETHING ON IT? SOUNDS LIKE. LET'S DO THE STUDY. OH, THERE'S ENOUGH TRAFFIC. DO Y'ALL THINK SO OR NO? I THINK WE JUST KNOCK ON SOME DOORS. LET'S. LET'S HOLD OFF THE FIRST STEP. LET'S KNOCK ON THE DOORS FIRST. START THERE. 
          OKAY. AND CONTINUES. WE'LL WE'LL MOVE FORWARD WITH THE REST OF IT. ALL RIGHT. THANK Y'ALL. THANK YOU. THANKS, CHRIS. I JUST AS AN ADDITION TO THAT, I THINK WE'LL KNOCK ON DOORS, BUT WE'LL ALSO PREPARE SOME WRITTEN COMMUNICATION TO POST AS WELL SO THAT THEY HAVE IT AS WELL. OKAY. ANY CITY COUNCIL, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS BEFORE REGULAR SESSION? NO, SIR. OKAY. 
          WE'RE GOING TO ADJOURN AT 638. WE'LL INVOCATION SPOKEN BY HAROLD 
          [REGULAR SESSION - 7:00 PM]
MCGILL, CITY COUNCILMAN. HEAVENLY FATHER, THANK YOU FOR ANOTHER DAY. THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE THE CITY. GUIDE US IN THE DECISIONS THAT WE MAKE. WE ASK YOU TO PROTECT OUR FIRST RESPONDERS. BLESS THOSE THAT HAVE LOST A LOVED ONES HERE LATELY. BLESS THOSE THAT ARE SICK AND NEED YOUR HEALING HANDS. PROTECT THE ONES THAT ARE HERE TONIGHT. SAFE TRIP HOME. PROTECT OUR CITIZENS HERE IN SEAGOVILLE. WE ASK THIS IN JESUS CHRIST'S NAME. AMEN. 
          AMEN. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. 
          OKAY, WE GOT THE MAYOR'S REPORT. THURSDAY, JULY 18TH IS THIRD. SATURDAY CLEANUP CIVIL SERVICE CENTER LOCATED AT 101 NORTH WATSON FROM 8 A.M. TO 12 P.M. THIS IS A FREE MONTHLY DUMPSTER THAT'S LOCATED. LET'S SEE. CITIZENS HAVE ACCESS TO DISPOSE OF ANY UNWANTED ITEMS. TEEN 
          [00:10:11]
NIGHT AT THE LIBRARY ON JULY THE 27TH FROM 6 P.M. TO 7:30 P.M. AGES 13 THROUGH 17. 
          WELCOME TO COME ENJOY GAMES OR JUST HANG OUT. OUR BUDGET WORKSHOP WILL BE HELD JULY THE 27TH AT SEAGOVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, LOCATED AT 1185 EAST SIMONS ROAD AT 6:30 P.M. 
          WE HAVE PUBLIC COMMENTS. THIS PORTION OF THE MEETING IS ALLOWED. REGISTERED SPEAKERS. 
          THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL. CITY COUNCIL WILL NOT DISCUSS OR TAKE ACTION RELATED TO ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS MADE DURING THIS TIME. WE HAVE TWO PEOPLE MICHAEL TURNER. I WANT YOU BACK HERE, OKAY? MICHAEL TURNER. FOR SOME SPEED BUMPS ON THE STREET. WE HAVE PEOPLE FLYING UP AND DOWN THE ROAD, SOMETIMES 70 TO 80 MILES AN HOUR. SOMETIMES YOU CAN BE TRYING TO TURN IN YOUR DRIVEWAY, AND SOMETIMES YOU HAVE TO TURN A LITTLE BIT WIDE TO GET IN THE DRIVEWAY. PEOPLE WILL SPEED RIGHT BETWEEN YOU AND YOUR DRIVEWAY. I'VE ALMOST BEEN HIT 5 OR 6 TIMES. MY NEIGHBOR'S ALMOST BEEN HIT 5 OR 6 TIMES. WE'VE HAD CARS FLIPPED FROM HITTING OTHER CARS ON THE STREET. WE'VE HAD MIRRORS KNOCKED OFF ON REGULAR BASIS. 
          PEOPLE FLYING THROUGH THERE. IT'S DANGEROUS. THERE'S KIDS THAT PLAY OUT THERE, OLD PEOPLE WALKING AROUND. SOMEBODY'S GOING TO GET KILLED THERE AFTER SOMEBODY'S DEAD. IT'S TWO TOO LATE TO TAKE CARE OF THE PROBLEM. I HEARD SOMEBODY SAY IT MIGHT SLOW DOWN RESPONSE TIME. WELL, IT'S NOT GOING TO SLOW IT DOWN THAT MUCH BECAUSE THE STREETS ARE TIED TO GET THROUGH ANYWAY. YOU CAN'T DO VERY FAST UNLESS YOU'RE SPEEDING. AND IT'S A STRAIGHT SHOT FROM. I THINK IT'S FARMERS ROAD DOWN TO THE ENTRANCE RAMP OF THE FREEWAY. THAT'S WHY PEOPLE TAKE IT. AND THEY HAVE NO REGARD FOR ANYBODY THAT LIVES ON THE STREET. THEY PUT LITTLE MARKERS OUT THERE THAT DOESN'T DO ANYTHING. AND. EXCUSE ME, I GOT ASTHMA. IT'S HARD TO BREATHE SOMETIMES. BUT ANYWAY, IT'S BEEN LIKE THAT FOR EVER SINCE I'VE BEEN THERE. 
          NEARLY 20 YEARS. I'VE HAD I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY TIMES PEOPLE NEARLY GET HIT JUST WALKING OUT IN THE STREET. YOU CAN'T WALK OUT IN THE STREET WITHOUT LOOKING. YOU'RE GOING TO GET HIT. AND IT'S A DANGEROUS, DANGEROUS SITUATION. IT NEEDS TO HAVE SOMETHING DONE WITH IT. I'VE HAD REQUESTS THAT AN OFFICER TO COME OUT THERE TO SET UP AND WATCH SOMETIME, JUST TO SEE IF THEY SEE ANYTHING. WELL, THE ONES THAT DID CAME AND SIT RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN STOP SIGN AND INTERSECTION, RIGHT OUT IN THE OPEN. WHO'S GOING TO COME SPEEDING THROUGH THERE? IF THEY SEE A COP SITTING THERE? NOBODY. SO IT DOESN'T DO ANY GOOD. THEY NEED TO BE HIDDEN WHERE THEY CAN ACTUALLY SEE. I HAD A GUY DRIVE THROUGH THERE YESTERDAY, ABOUT 4:00 IN THE MORNING WHEN I USED TO GET UP, AND THAT'S THE TIME I USED TO GET UP TO GO TO WORK. HE HAD TO BE DOING 70 OR 80 MILES AN HOUR. WHEN HE WENT BY, IT WAS LIKE, WHEW! AND HE WAS GONE. AND I'M GETTING I CAN'T BREATHE, SO I'M GONNA HAVE TO TURN MY TIME AND RISK MY. BUT I APPRECIATE YOU LISTENING, AND I'D APPRECIATE IF WE COULD GET SOMETHING DONE OUT THERE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, SIR. NEXT SPEAKER. THE NAME. FOR MALE. MCSPADDEN. STONE. 
          STONE. THAT'S A NEW ONE. I'VE NEVER HEARD THAT ONE. COME HERE. I WAS ABLE TO TURN IN THE FOLDERS TO EVERYBODY, I JUST. GOOD EVENING. IT'S IT'S ABOUT A COMMON REQUEST. COMMON. THE TRAFFIC DOWN ON HIGHLAND DRIVE. I HAVE BEEN THERE FOR 24 YEARS MYSELF. INSIDE YOUR PACKET I HAVE PHOTOS EXHIBIT. SEE AN AERIAL MAP THAT'S ON THE FRONT. THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN 
          [00:15:02]
FROM THE CITY WEBSITE IS IN THAT PACKET AS WELL. IN A SUMMARY OF THE CITY'S ADOPTED TRAFFIC CONTROL PROGRAM. AND I JUST SUMMARIZED IT AND IT. EXHIBIT D. I HAVE A SIGNED PETITION OF OVER 80% OF THE RESIDENTS ON HIGHLAND DRIVE. THAT'S IN THE PACKET AS WELL. 
          SO WHY ARE WE WHY WHY ARE WE HERE IS TO RESPECTFULLY REQUEST AN INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES ON HIGHLAND DRIVE, SPECIFICALLY SOME SPEED TABLES, MAYBE SOME HUMPS TO TO SLOW THEM DOWN. THAT'S ADOPTED BY THE TRAFFIC CONTROL PROGRAM THAT THE CITY HAS AS WELL. I REVIEWED THE TRAFFIC CONTROL PROGRAM AND THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN BEFORE MAKING THIS REQUEST, AND I BELIEVE HIGHLAND DRIVE MEETS THE CITY'S CRITERIA FOR IT AS WELL. THEN WHY HIGHLAND DRIVE? WELL, IT'S A LOCAL STREET. IT'S NOT A IT'S NOT A COLLECTOR. IT'S NOT A ARTERIAL ROADWAY. IT'S A RESIDENTIAL STREET. IT'S WHAT IT'S CONSIDERED AS. IF YOU LOOK AT THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN FROM THE CITY'S WEBSITE. AND IT'S JUST THE SPEEDING IS THERE. 
          I'VE BEEN THERE FOR A LONG ENOUGH. WE PUT OUT ROAD SIGNS AT ONE POINT, AND IT'S ALSO THE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC WE'RE GETTING. IT'S A LOT MORE THAN WHAT IT USED TO BE, AND A LOT MORE OF THEM ARE JUST REALLY, REALLY, THEY JUST DON'T CARE. I'VE HAD THEM JUMP IN MY DRIVEWAY TO GET AROUND ME, GO IN MY DRIVEWAY, TURN HIT THE CURB TO GET BACK ON THE HIGHLAND DRIVE. I KEEP A MIRROR FOR MY LITTLE TRUCK, JUST I IN THE GARAGE BECAUSE I KNOW IT'S GOING TO GET TAKEN OUT. AND AS I WAS GOING DOOR TO DOOR GETTING THE PETITIONS, IT WASN'T VERY DIFFICULT. THE ONLY ONES I WASN'T ABLE TO GET, THEY JUST I COULDN'T CATCH THEM AT HOME. BUT FROM THE YOUNG FAMILIES, WHAT I GOT WAS WE CANNOT LET OUR CHILDREN OUT FRONT. IT'S JUST IT'S TOO FEARFUL. WE KNOW THAT. WE KNOW WE HAVE A PROBLEM OR YOU GUYS WOULDN'T HAVE PAINTED SLOW DOWN ON THE STREET AND PAINTED THE 25 MILE AN HOUR ZONE AND PUT THE CAT EYES WITH THE ON THE STRIPES AS WELL. SO WE KNOW THAT THERE'S AN ISSUE. BUT UNFORTUNATELY, IN ABOUT A DAY AND A HALF IT WENT AWAY. IT WAS LIKE MAYBE THEY THOUGHT THERE WAS A HUMP THERE WHEN THEY SAW THE CAT EYES IN THE WHITE PAINT. SO YOU COULD SEE THEM KIND OF LIKE SLOW DOWN THE ONES. THEY FIGURED OUT THAT IT WAS JUST, YOU KNOW, THOSE LITTLE CAT EYES THEY TOOK OFF. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THERE'S CARS THAT ARE PARKED ON THERE. IT'S ABOUT 20 FOOT WIDE, ABOUT 1600 FOOT LONG STREET. AND IF YOU'RE COMING UP FROM THE FARMERS AREA AND YOU NOTICE IN ONE OF THOSE PICTURES THAT IS NOT A 90 DEGREE TURN, YOU'RE NOT REALLY TURNING ON THE FARMERS. IF YOU'RE HEADING TOWARDS HALL STREET, IT THAT IS A CURVE. REALLY. IT'S DAMN, TOM, IT'S JUST A CURVE. THAT'S FINE. 
          BUT HOPEFULLY WITH THE FOLDER YOU CAN TAKE ME A LITTLE MORE SERIOUSLY IS WHAT I'M HOPING FOR. AND MAYBE I COULD LOOK AT IT, MAYBE PUT IT ON AN AGENDA TO HELP US ON THE STREET. THANK 
          [Consent Agenda]
YOU FOR YOUR. CONSENT AGENDA. CONSIDER APPROVING THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JUNE 22ND, 2026 AND JUNE 23RD, 2026. I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. SECOND YOUR MOTION, SIR. ALL IN FAVOR? THAT'S ALL OF US. NEXT, WE'VE GOT A. PUBLIC HEARING. CONDUCT 
          [Public Hearing]
PUBLIC HEARING, AND CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COMPENSATION, ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP, AS PREVIOUSLY AMENDED, BY GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WITH A BASE ZONING OF LOCAL RETAIL PD, LR TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT WITH A BASE ZONING OF LOCAL RETAIL AMENDED PD IN LR AMENDED FOR ANY APPROXIMATELY 2.36 ACRES TRACK OUT OF THE JD MERCHANT SURVEY. 
          ABSTRACT NUMBER 850. SEAGOVILLE DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS DEED RECORDS VOLUME 2000181. PAGE 
          [00:20:16]
5624. AND COMMONLY KNOWN AS 100 CRESTVIEW DRIVE, PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF ANY AMENDED SITE, CONCEPT PLAN, CONSENT PLAN AND APPROVING A PENALTY FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF $2,000 FOR EACH OFFENSE. OPENING THE PUBLIC HEARING. 0712. THANK YOU SIR. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR PRO TEM AND COUNCIL, WE HAVE A BRIEF SLIDESHOW FOR YOU CONCERNING THIS PROPERTY. NORMALLY, A DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, BILL MEDINA, HANDLES THESE, BUT HE IS ON VACATION. SO IT'S UP TO ME. AND SO I HAVE A BRIEF SLIDESHOW HERE JUST EXPLAINING KIND OF THE THE ORIGINAL ZONING THAT WAS ON THE PROPERTY VERSUS THE NEW ONE THAT IS BEING REQUESTED. AND SO YOU ALL ARE VERY FAMILIAR WITH 100 CRESTVIEW. 
          IT'S THE PARCEL IDENTIFIED IN GREEN HERE, KIND OF BEHIND WALMART AND ACROSS THE STREET FROM CHICK FIL A. IF YOU'LL GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE. OH, I CAN CLICK IT. THAT'S A LOT EASIER. 
          THERE WE GO. THANKS, CASEY. SO THIS PROPERTY WAS ORIGINALLY ZONED VIA PD BACK IN 2024, AND IT WAS VERY STRINGENT IN THE TYPES OF USES THAT WERE PERMITTED ON THE PROPERTY. 
          THERE'S REALLY JUST TWO TYPES. IT WAS RESTAURANTS OF SOME TYPE, EITHER DRIVE THRU OR DINE IN OR SOME COMBINATION. AND THEN NATIONAL TIRE CHAIN FACILITIES, BUT ONLY NATIONAL BRAND ONES. 
          THEY COULDN'T HAVE ANY OUTSIDE STORAGE. SINCE THAT TIME IN 2024, THE PROPERTY HAS CHANGED HANDS, HAS NEW OWNERSHIP, AND THEY CAME BACK TO THE CITY REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE PD, BROADENING OUT THE TYPES OF USES THAT ARE ACCEPTABLE. IT'S STILL RELATIVELY STRINGENT, CERTAINLY MORE STRINGENT THAN WHAT'S INCLUDED IN UNDER LOCAL RETAIL, BUT THERE'S A LOT MORE FLEXIBILITY FOR TYPES OF USERS. YOU CAN SEE THE LIST ON HERE, BOTH RESTAURANTS AND THE TIRE SHOPS ARE BOTH INCLUDED IN THE ORIGINAL TEXT OF THE PD AMENDMENT. THE ORIGINAL TEXT. 
          WE'LL GET TO THAT. YEAH. BUT THERE'S ALSO THERE'S BROADER USES. SO DIFFERENT TYPES OF USERS COULD COME IN AND BUILD ON THIS PROPERTY AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE. IN ADDITION TO THAT, THERE'S A FEW OTHER CHANGES THAT WERE REQUESTED, THE BIGGEST ONE BEING AN INCREASE IN DENSITY. THE ORIGINAL PD ONLY ALLOWED FOR TWO PAD SITES. THE NEW OWNER IS REQUESTING UP TO THREE. THERE'S NOT A GUARANTEE THAT THERE WILL BE THREE. IT COULD END UP BEING JUST TWO USERS THAT GO ON THAT SITE, BUT THEY WANTED THAT FLEXIBILITY TO BE ABLE TO PARCEL IT OUT TO MULTIPLE DIFFERENT USERS IN THE FUTURE. ADDITIONALLY, THEY'RE REQUESTING SMALLER PARKING STALLS. THEY'RE REQUESTING THE THEY REQUESTED THE ELIMINATION OF A DRIVE THRU ESCAPE LANE FOR THE APPLICABLE USERS OR FOR THOSE FUTURE USERS. THEY WANT TO DO IT ON THE BASIS OF SHARED PARKING BETWEEN ALL OF THE SITES. AND THEN THEY DID INCLUDE ELIMINATION OF ANY OUTSOURCED OUTSIDE STORAGE OR DISPLAY OF ANY KIND FOR THOSE USERS, THIS IS A QUICK CONCEPT PLAN OF THE SITE, THE ONE IT'S LABELED LOT ONE, BUT IT'S THE ONE DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO CRESTVIEW. THAT ONE IS A BIT FURTHER ALONG IN THE PROCESS. 
          THE PROPERTY OWNER HAS BEEN WORKING WITH EXCITED TENANTS WHO ARE EAGER TO DEVELOP HERE IN SEAGOVILLE. THE SITES FOR LOT TWO AND LOT THREE ARE MUCH MORE CONCEPTUAL, SO THOSE COULD CHANGE AS THE ACTUAL USERS COME IN AND WANT TO ADJUST THEIR SITE A LITTLE BIT. OR AGAIN, IT COULD BE COMBINED INTO ONE LARGER PAD. IN THE FUTURE, IT WOULD ULTIMATELY BE THE PROPERTY OWNER'S DISCRETION FOR THAT. THIS WAS BROUGHT TO THE COMMISSION AT THE PREVIOUS MEETING, AND THEY DID RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE ZONING REQUEST, BUT THEY HAD TWO CONDITIONS UPON WHICH THAT APPROVAL WAS WAS GIVEN. ONE WAS THE REMOVAL OF A NATIONAL BRAND TIRE SHOP AS A PERMITTED LAND USE. AND THEN THE OTHER WAS THE RESTRICTION OF THE ESCAPE LANES. 
          THE REASON FOR THE ESCAPE LANES IS BECAUSE THEY ALLOWED IT FOR LOT ONE, BECAUSE THE TYPE OF USER THAT'S EXPECTED TO GO THERE WOULDN'T ACTUALLY HAVE STACKING IN THEIR DRIVE THROUGH, QUOTE UNQUOTE. IT WOULD JUST BE USED FOR PICKUP PURPOSES. BUT THE USERS FOR LOTS TWO AND THREE ARE PADS TWO AND THREE AREN'T KNOWN AT THIS TIME. AND SO THEY DIDN'T WANT TO ALLOW FOR JUST A WIDESPREAD WAIVER FOR THE ESCAPE LANES FOR THOSE OTHER TWO SITES IN THE FUTURE. 
          AND SO IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON ANY OF THIS, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM. AND WE ALSO DO HAVE REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE DEVELOPER HERE. CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE SLIDE WHERE THEY'RE ASKING FOR THINGS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE ORIGINAL? OKAY. NOPE. NEXT ONE. SO THE ELIMINATION OF ANY OUTSIDE STORAGE OR DISPLAY OF ANY KIND FOR FUTURE USES. NOW BACK. GO 
          [00:25:04]
BACK ONE. OOPS. SO WE HAVE RETAIL. I MEAN, A THRIFT STORE COULD COME IN HERE. AND THEY COULD STORE STUFF OUTSIDE. WE HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT. IF WE ALLOW IT'S IT'S KIND OF CONFUSINGLY WORRIED. THEY'RE NOT WANTING US TO ELIMINATE. THEY ARE ELIMINATING ANY TYPE OF OUTSIDE STORAGE OR DISPLAY FOR FUTURE USE. THAT WRONG. OKAY. IT'S CONFUSINGLY WORDED. 
          THEN I HAVE NO QUESTIONS. YES, SIR. IF YOU GO TO THE SLIDE WHERE IT SHOWS THE PAD SITES. 
          AS YOU. IF I SEE HERE PULLING OFF A BRIDGE ONTO CRESTVIEW, HOW ARE YOU GOING TO STACK TRAFFIC SINCE YOU'VE GOT AN ENTRY RIGHT NEARLY AT CHRIS I MEAN, AT MALLOY, YOU GOT PARKING PLACES. PEOPLE ARE GOING TO BE PULLING IN OR OUT OF THOSE PARKING PLACES. SO MORE CHANCES THAN NOT, YOU'RE GOING TO BE STACKING TRAFFIC ON CRESTVIEW FOR PEOPLE TRYING TO EITHER BACK IN OR BACK OUT OF A PARKING SPACE. THE DEVELOPER TEAM DID COMPLETE A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, AND THEY HAVE REPRESENTATIVES HERE WHO CAN PROBABLY SPEAK TO THAT MORE SUCCINCTLY THAN I. THERE'S NO GUARANTEE THAT THAT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. AARON HAWKINS WITH QUIDDITY ENGINEERING. WE'RE AT 4500 MERCANTILE PLAZA IN FORT WORTH. IT. I MEAN, THERE'S NO GUARANTEES IN ANYTHING, RIGHT? BUT WE DID DO WHAT WE COULD TO MITIGATE THAT CONCERN. YOU CAN SEE THAT WE DO NOW HAVE OUR DETENTION UP IN THE FRONT OF THE LOT. THAT PUSHES THAT DRIVEWAY JUST A LITTLE BIT FURTHER BACK. THE OTHER THING THAT WAS DONE AFTER WE DISCUSSED WITH THE CITY WAS THE ADDITION OF WHAT WE CALL A PORK CHOP, BUT IT KIND OF REALLY ENCOURAGES ALMOST FORCES THAT RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT MOVEMENT TO MITIGATE ANY ADDITIONAL STACKING THERE. SO YOUR FULL SERVICE DRIVE WOULD ACTUALLY BE THE BACK SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. 
          AND THEN THE OTHER THING THAT WE DID WAS WE COULD HAVE ALREADY PUT ADDITIONAL PARKING IN FRONT OF THE DRIVEWAY PAST THE TURN RADIUS, BUT WE DID HAVE, I BELIEVE IT'S LIKE 20, 25FT THERE BEFORE WE EVEN START OUR PARKING STALLS. SO THE PORK CHOP IS JUST LEFT OF WHERE IT SAYS LOT ONE, RIGHT? YES, SIR. PEOPLE COMING OUT, PEOPLE COMING OUT OF THAT ESTABLISHMENT WOULD HAVE TO TAKE A RIGHT ON CRESTVIEW. YES, SIR. AND THEN IF THEY'RE COMING OFF MALLOY ONTO CRESTVIEW AND WANT TO GO INTO THE ESTABLISHMENT, THEY WOULD TURN RIGHT. THEY THEY COULD ENTER THAT FIRST DRIVEWAY. BUT. YES. RIGHT. BUT LIKE YOU SAID, EVEN THOUGH THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO TURN RIGHT, THAT DIDN'T MEAN THEY COULDN'T GO RIGHT. AND THEN QUICKLY TURN LEFT. WHAT THEY'LL DO. SO BUT THAT WOULD JUST HAVE TO BE ENFORCED BY POLICE. THERE IS I MEAN, JUST THINKING ABOUT THE SPACING FROM CRESTVIEW BEFORE EVEN GETTING TO THE FIRST SPACE. THERE IS 2 OR 3 CARS LENGTHS BETWEEN THAT FIRST SPACE AND CRESTVIEW. YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT WHEN YOU'RE TURNING IN FROM CRESCENT JUST RIGHT. YES, I'M TALKING ABOUT I'M TALKING ABOUT WHEN THEY'RE GOING OUT OF THE ESTABLISHMENT. THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO TAKE A RIGHT ON CRESTVIEW. I ALREADY CAN SEE SOME FOOLS DOING A RIGHT AND THEN QUICKLY GOING TO LEFT. THEY'LL DO IT. SO YOU'VE GOT AN ENTRANCE LOOK LIKE OFF OF MALLOY? YES, SIR. WHY COULDN'T THAT BE YOUR ENTRANCE? AND ELIMINATE THAT ONE THERE. AND THEN YOU'VE GOT AN EXIT AT THE BACK. YOU WON'T HAVE A STACKING PROBLEM. YOU WON'T HAVE THE TRAFFIC ISSUE THAT THIS IS GOING TO CREATE. I MEAN, I KNOW YOUR TIA MAY SHOW THAT IT'S NOT AN ISSUE, BUT THAT'S JUST A SNAPSHOT IN TIME. WE LIVE HERE. I LIVE YEAH. YOU KNOW, A QUARTER OF A MILE FROM THIS. AND I SEE THAT TRAFFIC EVERY DAY. ALL RIGHT. AND SO AND I KNOW HOW PEOPLE DRIVE. I MEAN, YOU HEARD HIGHLAND DRIVE, WE GOT PEOPLE THAT THINK IT'S A DAMN EXPRESSWAY. SO. IF IT'S POSSIBLE TO ELIMINATE THAT OR I MEAN, IT WOULD HAVE TO BE ELIMINATED THAT BECAUSE I ALREADY SEE PEOPLE TRYING TO SKIRT WHAT'S REQUIRED AND THEY'RE GOING TO TRY TO GO LEFT, CAUSE A TRAFFIC JAM AND EVERYBODY'S GOING TO BE HONKING AND OFF AFTER THEY EAT THEIR FOOD. SO WHAT? I MEAN, WHAT IS IT? BECAUSE THAT'S REQUIRED THAT YOU HAVE THAT ENTRANCE AND EXIT? WHAT, WHAT IS THE REASON FOR, FOR PUTTING IT THERE? I MEAN, FURTHER CIRCULATION OF THE SITE. I MEAN, IT IS BETTER FOR THE USER TO HAVE IT AT THIS POINT. WE ALSO DO HAVE A USER 
          [00:30:09]
READY TO COME IN THERE. THEY'VE APPROVED THE SITE PLAN. ANY MODIFICATIONS AT THIS POINT WOULD HAVE TO GET REAPPROVED. IT ALSO GOES INTO THEIR PROFORMA OF EVERY ENTRANCE THAT THEY HAVE GOES INTO IT. EVERYTHING THAT'S REMOVED, THEY REEVALUATE THE SITE FOR THEIR SALES, RIGHT? SO I'M NOT SURE IT'S AS EASY AS. AND SO THE DRIVE THROUGH IS ON THAT SAME SIDE WHERE THE PORK CHOPS AT OF THE BUILDING, THE, THE, THAT LANES EXIT IS THERE. YES. BUT AGAIN, THAT'S, THAT'S NOT A TYPICAL DRIVE THROUGH USE. IT IS OR IS NOT A DRIVE THROUGH IT. 
          IT IS A DRIVE THROUGH. IT IS A MOBILE PICKUP. IT DOES NOT HAVE A IT DOES NOT HAVE A POINT OF ORDER. ORDER. OKAY. YEAH. I JUST THINK YOU GOT A MAJOR PROBLEM THERE BECAUSE I GO THROUGH THERE 2 OR 3 TIMES A WEEK, JUST LIKE COUNCILMAN HERNANDEZ SAYS, I'VE SEEN IT. 
          DON'T KNOW HOW MANY TIMES, EVEN WITH NOTHING THERE NOW, TRAFFIC TURNING IN THERE AND STACKS UP. 
          AND THAT'S GOING TO BE A MAJOR PROBLEM. YOU GOT AN ENTRANCE ON MALLOY. YOU GOT TO EXIT BACK DOWN ON CRESTVIEW, WHICH WOULD ELIMINATE THAT PROBLEM. TOTALLY. GUYS, TO BE HONEST WITH YOU, PEOPLE AREN'T GOING TO WANT TO TURN RIGHT ON CRESTVIEW. THEY'RE COMING OFF OF MALLOY. 
          YEAH, THEY WANT TO GET BACK ON THE EXPRESSWAY. AND SO YOU'RE THROWING PEOPLE ONTO CRESTVIEW THAT ARE GOING TO GO TO HALL, AND THEY'RE GOING TO SAY, NOPE, I WANT TO GO LEFT. AND SO I DON'T SEE PEOPLE EITHER USING THAT BECAUSE LIKE I SAID, THEY EITHER WANT TO CONTINUE ON MALLOY OR GO TO THE SERVICE ROAD TO GET ON THE HIGHWAY, OR YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE PEOPLE TRYING TO SHORTCUT IT. I MEAN, YOU'RE FORCING PEOPLE TO GO A ROUTE THEY DON'T WANT TO GO, WELL, IF IT WERE ME, BUT I'M A PERSON THAT WOULD FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS. IF I WANTED TO GO THAT WAY, I'D EITHER COME OUT AND TURN RIGHT ONTO MALLOY BRIDGE, OR I WOULD WRAP AROUND THE BUILDING AND GO TO THAT BACK EXIT TO TURN LEFT ONTO CRESTVIEW. YEAH, I MEAN. I AGREE THAT'S THE RIGHT WAY, BUT THAT'S GONE WITH THE BATH WATER LATELY. IT'S THE RIGHT WAY TO TO DO THE RIGHT THING. YOU KNOW, THEY WANT AND I'M JUST TELLING YOU, WHAT WE SEE AS REALITY IS THAT PEOPLE, YOU KNOW, AND. I SEE THE SECOND PROBLEM. THERE'S NO WAY. I MEAN, YOU CAN PUT WHATEVER YOU WANT TO FOR A DIRECTION, BUT PEOPLE COME OUT AND THEY'RE GOING TO GO BACK TO MALLOY BRIDGE. IS IT GOING TO BE A BARRIER FROM THAT, THAT SIDE WHERE IT WON'T BE ABLE TO GET OUT? YOU'VE JUST GOT LITTLE JUST TO DRIVE OUT A CONCRETE WEDGE THERE WHERE THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO TURN RIGHT. THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT, OR TURN RIGHT INTO THAT PROPERTY. SO ARE YOU GOING TO HAVE A BACK FENCE ON THE BACK OF THERE? YES, SIR. ONE OF THE CONDITIONS OF THE PD IS TO HAVE A MASONRY SCREENING WALL ON, YOU KNOW, BOTH SIDES FACING RESIDENTIAL. YES, SIR. AND THAT MIGHT BE A CONFLICT TOO, BECAUSE IF THEY GOT A SCOOP WAY UP TO GET OUT TO SEE WHAT THEY'RE GOING WHEN THEY'RE EXITING OUT, THE FENCE IS OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING SETBACK. SO THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE TO THERE SHOULD BE NO ISSUES WITH THAT. SO WHAT YOU'RE SAYING YOU WANT THEM TO TAKE A RIDE ON THAT PORK CHOP AND THEN GO TO THE BACK ENTRANCE AND GET ROUND BACK TO MALLOY? THEY CAN'T. NO, SORRY. RIGHT NOW WE'RE JUST TALKING ABOUT EXITING FROM THIS FIRST LOTS DRIVE THROUGH. WHAT I WAS MEANING IS LEAVE GO ACROSS THE FIRE LANE TO GO SOUTH. I GUESS IT WOULD BE SOUTHBOUND ON MALLOY. TURN RIGHT COMING OUT OF THE PROPERTY OR COME OUT. GO BACK TO THE FIRE LANE. HEAD NORTH ON THE PLAN TO GO TO THE FULL SERVICE. DRIVE THROUGH ON THE NORTHWEST. I THINK IT WON'T WORK ON THAT. IT WON'T SHOW UP? NO. SO WELL, YOU HAVE THIS DRIVEWAY, YOU COULD COME OUT AND ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THIS DRIVEWAY, OR BE THIS DRIVEWAY AND WRAP AROUND THE PROPERTY BACK TO THIS DRIVEWAY. THAT'S WHAT I WAS IMPLYING. AND THAT'S WHAT I'M SAYING. I MEAN, IF YOU'RE STILL GOING TO HAVE THEM WRAP, IF YOU'RE SAYING, BECAUSE I'M TELLING YOU 95% OF THE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO WANT TO GET BACK TO MALLOY. YEP. SO IF YOU'RE SAYING, HEY, TAKE A RIGHT AND THEN TAKE ANOTHER RIGHT WRAP AROUND, THAT'S 95% OF YOUR TRAFFIC, THEN WHY EVEN HAVE IT? JUST HAVE THEM TAKE IT OUT OF THE PICK UP ORDER LANE. JUST TAKE A LEFT. IT'S NOT INTENDED TO BE FOR THAT. LANE'S EXITING. IN MY OPINION. IT'S INTENDED FOR REALLY ONLY THE 
          [00:35:02]
ENTRANCE IS MY THOUGHT PROCESS TO GET THEM IN FRONT OF THE PROPERTY. BUT IF IF IT WERE NOT THERE, THEY'D HAVE TO DO THE SAME MANEUVER THAT I WAS JUST DISCUSSING. THE INTERRUPT. 
          MALLOY AND THE EXIT AT THE BACK. BACK THERE BY ON CRESTVIEW. AND YOU WON'T HAVE THAT TRAFFIC PROBLEM. PEOPLE TRYING TO ENTER OR EXIT AT THAT LOCATION THERE. I GO THROUGH THERE 3 OR 4 TIMES A WEEK AND I SEE THE PROBLEM WE HAVE THERE. NOW THAT'S JUST GOING TO COMPOUND THE PROBLEM FIVE TIMES OVER. SIMPLE SOLUTION. YOU GOT ENTRANCE AND EXIT BACK HERE AND YOU GO RIGHT OR LEFT. PEOPLE COMING OFF OF MALLOY GOING INTO THIS FACILITY ARE GOING TO WANT TO GO BACK ON MALLOY. YOU GOT PEOPLE THAT COME THROUGH MALLOY THAT DON'T LIVE HERE. THEY WANT TO STOP IN AT THIS FACILITY. THEY DON'T KNOW WHERE THESE STREETS GO. THEY'RE NOT GOING TO START WANDERING THROUGH NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS TO TRY TO GET BACK TO MALLOY OR 175. SO, I MEAN, THE INTENTION IS THAT THE WAY TO GET BACK TO MALLOY IS THROUGH THE DIRECT ACCESS ON THE SOUTHWEST OF THE PROPERTY. THE ELIMINATE THAT AND YOU ELIMINATE THE WHOLE PROBLEM. SO YOU'VE GOT AN ENTRANCE THERE AND YOU'VE GOT AN ENTRANCE OR EXIT AT THE BACK CORNER. YOU'VE ELIMINATED ALL THE PROBLEMS. WELL, THIS ONE AT THE SOUTH, AT THE SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY IS A FULL SERVICE. IT WOULD BE AN ENTRANCE AND AN EXIT. SO THAT'S HOW THEY WOULD EXIT BACK ONTO MALLOY. MOST PEOPLE WOULD WANT TO DO THAT ANYWAY TO, YOU KNOW, AVOID IF YOU DON'T LIVE HERE, YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND ABOUT GETTING ON CRESTVIEW AT THE BACK. I WAS TALKING ABOUT IF I WAS TRYING TO GET BACK ON MALLOY AND GET BACK TO THE HIGHWAY, I WOULD HAVE I WOULD EXIT HERE. WHICH IS MORE MALLOY BRIDGE, RIGHT? RIGHT. YEAH. SO WHAT HE'S SAYING IS YOU'RE GOING TO HE'S GOING TO LOOP BACK AROUND. SO AS YOU COME THROUGH THE DRIVE THROUGH, THEY JUST COME RIGHT BACK OUT AND COME RIGHT BACK ON MALLOY. MOST OF THEM WILL ELIMINATE THAT RIGHT AND LEFT SITUATION YOU GOT THERE. THERE'S NO PROBLEM. SO WOULD IT JUST BE EASIER JUST TO FLIP IT INSTEAD OF DOING WHAT THEY'RE DOING NOW? IF I JUST SAY YOU GET RID OF THAT PORK CHOP AND YOU WON'T HAVE THAT ENTRANCE AND YOU HAVE THAT PROBLEM, YOU GOT ENTRANCE OFF MALLOY, YOU GOT ENTRANCE EXIT BACK OFF OF CRESTVIEW. I CAN SEE IT'S EFFICIENT TO GET PEOPLE OUT OF THE PICKUP LANE. BUT WHERE THIS IS LOCATED AND THAT INTERSECTION, IT'S NOT SAFE. RIGHT? RIGHT. I SEE THAT AND EFFICIENCY WHEN IT COMES TO SAFETY, SAFETY IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN EFFICIENCY. IF YOU IF THEY DO THE TRAFFIC, IF YOU CREATE THAT, THEY'RE THERE. 
          NOW YOU'RE STUCK WITH IT FOR THE REST OF THE LIFE TRAFFIC STUDY IS JUST AND THIS IS PUBLIC HEARING. SO WE'LL HAVE DISCUSSION A LITTLE BIT. GO AHEAD SIR. NO. SO MY NAME IS TY COUSER OR TYLER. I DON'T KNOW IF I NEED TO BE FORMAL, BUT I WAS THE ONE WHO WORKED ON THE TRAFFIC STUDY AND I WOULD SAY THEY HAVE THERE ARE DISCUSSIONS BETWEEN, I KNOW THE DEVELOPER AND THE CITY TO IMPROVE THAT INTERSECTION ALREADY. SO I DO KNOW THEY ARE LOOKING INTO THAT AND REALLY THEY'RE JUST TRYING TO MAXIMIZE. I SAY WE THEY JUST THE DEVELOPER IS TRYING TO MAXIMIZE THE IMPROVEMENTS ON SITE. REALLY, WHEN I SAY ON SITE, ADDING THE PORK CHOP, THINGS LIKE THAT TO IMPROVE THAT TRAFFIC, WE TALK ABOUT TRAFFIC TURNING IN ON MALLOY. 
          REALISTICALLY, A LOT OF PEOPLE WILL GO BACK TO WHERE THEY CAME. I UNDERSTAND IT BEING RIGHT THERE, BUT I KNOW WE'RE TALKING ABOUT WORST CASE. WHENEVER YOU'RE TRYING TO GET OUT AND TURN LEFT, RIGHT THERE. BUT I WOULD SAY WHAT THE DEVELOPER IS DOING IS THEY ARE IN TRYING TO ENTER AN AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE IMPROVEMENTS TO THAT INTERSECTION WHILE ALSO MAXIMIZING ON SITE WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO DO. SO THAT'S WHAT I WOULD SAY TO THAT. JUST KIND OF IN RESPONSE TO EVERYTHING, WHAT I'VE BEEN HEARING, TRYING TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT AND HAVING SOMETHING SOLID IN WRITING AND GUARANTEED IS TWO DIFFERENT THINGS. YEAH. IS THAT SOMETHING JUST JUST TO THAT END, MR. MCGILL, THE ITEM, THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA FOLLOWING THE PUBLIC HEARING IS THE AGREEMENT THAT THEY ARE PROPOSING AND REFERENCING, WHICH WE CAN DISCUSS FURTHER IN EXECUTIVE SESSION, IF THAT'S YOUR DESIRE. OKAY. YEAH. AND THEN I KNOW WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, YOU KNOW, WE WOULD LIKE THEM TO MAKE THE MANEUVERS WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. THE OTHER THING THAT WE CAN DO WHERE THE PORK CHOP ITSELF ENCOURAGES THAT. 
          RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT. MANEUVER. WE CAN ADD ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE THAT, YOU KNOW, TALKS ABOUT, YOU KNOW, RIGHT TURN ONLY. WE CAN EVEN INCLUDE A SIGNS AT THE END OF THAT DRIVE THRU LANE THAT SAY LEFT TURN ONLY COMING OUT OF THAT LANE. BUT. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? HOW FAR IS THE EXIT FROM THE RED LIGHT? HOW FAR THE INTERSECTIONS RIGHT THERE. HOW 
          [00:40:01]
MANY FEET IS IT FROM THE INTERSECTION TO THAT EXIT? TO THE PORK CHOP, YOU MEAN? YEAH. 
          THEY TELL YOU EXACTLY HOW MANY CARS THEY GET IN THERE. AND AS SOON AS SOMEBODY TURNS, IF THERE'S TWO CARS AND YOU GOT A THIRD CAR ACROSS TRAFFIC, THAT'S WHAT WE'RE WORRIED ABOUT. 
          IT MIGHT BE 50FT, MAYBE. YEAH. FROM CURB LINE TO CURB LINE. IT'S ABOUT FROM THE INTERSECTION WHERE THE CAR IS GOING TO STOP, TO WHERE THE OTHER CAR IS GOING TO COME OUT. 
          HOW MANY FEET IS IT FROM THERE TO THERE? 25 FOOT BUILDING SETBACK. SO SO TWO AND A HALF CARS IF SET BACK GOES BACK TO THERE. SO AT THE PORK CHOP IT'S ANOTHER 20FT. SO 45FT OR SO. SO SAY FOR CARS. SO FOUR CARS STOPPED THERE. AND THEN SOMEBODY TURNS AND THEY'RE ACROSS THE TRAFFIC RIGHT. THEY'RE STOPPING THE WHOLE THING. THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. UNDERSTOOD. SO I MEAN NO, NO, I MEAN IT WOULD BE STOPPED BECAUSE THE DRIVE THROUGH LANE IS PACKED WOULD BE A RED LIGHT. THEN THEY TURN LEFT AND THEY'RE ACROSS THAT OTHER LANE AND THEY'RE STOPPING EVERYTHING IN THE INTERSECTION. AND THEY HAVE THAT PROBLEM HERE IN SOME PLACES IN THE LAST CAR THAT'S THERE WAS HOPING THAT THE LIGHT STAYS GREEN LONG ENOUGH, BUT IT CHANGES RED WHILE THEY'RE SITTING THERE. SO THEY'RE SITTING ACROSS FROM BRIDGE ROAD. SO WHERE ARE THEY GOING? THEY'RE GOING TO BACK UP IN TRAFFIC AND GET RUN OVER. 
          OKAY. AND IS IT POSSIBLE JUST TO KEEP IT WHERE YOU CAN TURN RIGHT INTO THE ESTABLISHMENTS. 
          BUT YOU CAN'T. I MEAN, IT WOULD JUST BE A ONE LANE PORK CHOP. I GUESS YOU WOULDN'T HAVE, YOU WOULDN'T HAVE IT TO WHERE IT ALLOWS YOU TO, TO GET OFF ON CRESTVIEW. THAT WAY YOUR YOUR PICKUP LANE WILL HAVE TO TAKE A LEFT TO GO, EITHER TO MALLOY OR RIGHT BACK AROUND TO ENTER CRESTVIEW THROUGH THE BACK. WHAT ARE THE ODDS YOUR DRIVERS TRY TO LEAVE OUT THAT. NO, NO. 
          OH. OUT OF. YEAH, WELL. I'M SORRY. I MEAN, THAT'S TRUE. THEY GET HIT THERE AT FAULT, SO. 
          YEAH. YEAH. THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE COULD LOOK INTO AGAIN. AT THIS POINT ALL SITE PLAN CHANGES ARE GOING TO HAVE TO GET APPROVED BY THE USER. AND SO THEY'RE GOING TO FACTOR THAT INTO EVERYTHING THAT THEY LOOK AT. SO BECAUSE AGAIN YOU CAN PUT SIGNAGE LEFT, YOU KNOW FOR THE DRIVE THRU LANES, LEFT TURN ONLY, YOU KNOW, BUT THEY DON'T READ, THEY SEE THAT, HEY, I CAN QUICKLY TAKE, TAKE A LEFT ON CRESTVIEW. THEY'RE GOING TO DO IT. THEY WILL DO IT. I MEAN, YES, SIGNS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE HELPFUL, BUT AS WE HEARD ON CRESTVIEW, THEY GOT SIGNS, THEY GOT CATS EYES. THEY GOT ALL TYPES OF STUFF. AS SOON AS THEY KNOW THAT IT'S THERE, THEY'LL CONTINUE TO DO ILLEGAL CRAP. OKAY. AND I GUESS WE'LL HAVE FURTHER DISCUSSION. KIRK. THANK YOU. ANYBODY ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS? NO ONE ELSE. OKAY. TIME IS 734. 
          WE'RE ENDING THE. PUBLIC HEARING. YES, MA'AM. WE HAVE A MOTION FOR THAT. NOT YET, NOT YET. DISCUSSION. WE WANT TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION, I BELIEVE. YES. GOOD IDEA. THAT'S WHAT I WAS TRYING TO SAY. WE. DON'T WANT TO COVER TODAY. IF I SAW THAT RIGHT NOW, I WOULD 
          [00:45:44]
EITHER GO THERE AND TURN AROUND OR I WOULD COME OUT ALSO, JUST BECAUSE WE. HAVE SO MANY. I UNDERSTAND. ALSO EVERY TIME I'VE EVER GONE TO THIS PART, RIGHT? HEY, GOOD TO SEE YOU. 
          WELL. YOU. SAY WE GOTTA GO. I SAY, WHAT TIME WOULD IT BE THERE? LATE NIGHT RIGHT NOW. 
          FOR. I DON'T. IT'S A DIFFERENT I'M JUST SAYING LIKE THAT'S AN OPTION. BUT THEN YOU WOULDN'T 
          [00:50:46]
NEED THE RIGHT NOW BECAUSE YOU. YEAH. I MEAN YOU CAN ALWAYS ADD. RIGHT THERE. OR YOU CAN. WORK. 
          WELL, THAT'S THE OTHER GOOD. PROVIDING MONEY FOR THEM. BUT I DON'T. I'LL HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH. IT'S JUST. KNOCKS IT OVER. BUT BUT DON'T DON'T. IN THE. WORK A LOT OF TIMES IT DOESN'T. 
          YEAH. YES MA'AM. YES, MA'AM. YES, SIR. REGULAR SESSION 746. ALL RIGHT. MAYOR PRO TEM, AFTER 
          [Regular Agenda]
DISCUSSIONS WITH COUNCIL, WE HAVE A PLAN FOR THIS AS FAR AS DETERRENT OF PEOPLE WANTING TO TURN LEFT ON CRESTVIEW AND EXITING THE ESTABLISHMENT. WE'RE GOOD. CAMERAS AT THE 
          [00:55:06]
LIGHT WILL HELP ON THE ON THE CYCLING OF THE LIGHTS TO ALLOW BETTER TRAFFIC FLOW THROUGH THE INTERSECTION. SO THAT'LL HELP ON CONGESTION AND WE'LL PUT. THE CITY WILL PUT ON CRESTVIEW. 
          LEFT TURN DETERRENT STICKS ON THE. IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ROADWAY. SO THAT WAY WHEN THEY THEY THEY'RE GOING TO BE FORCED TO GO. RIGHT. OTHERWISE THEY'LL BE RUNNING OVER SOME STICKS DOING DAMAGE TO THEIR VEHICLE. SO THAT WILL BE THE CITY TAKING CARE OF THAT. SO THERE'S REALLY NO AMENDMENT TO THE RESOLUTION THAT WE'RE HERE TO TALK ABOUT TONIGHT. SO WITH THAT, I APPROVE THE RESOLUTION. MAKE A MOTION NOT APPROVE. I MAKE A MOTION A SECOND. OKAY. ALL IN FAVOR? GOING TO NUMBER 13 DISCUSSION. CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPROVING FACILITIES. AGREEMENT. 
          FOR IN EFFEXOR WITH WHAT'S THIS WORD. HADN'T READ IT IN A WHILE. INFRASTRUCTURE FOR GUSTO. 
          SEAGOVILLE PLAZA LLC FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 100 CRESTVIEW LANE. SO THIS AGREEMENT WE HAVE THE FULL VERSION HERE AT THE DAIS WITH ALL OF THE EXHIBITS ATTACHED. I KNOW THE EXHIBITS WEREN'T IN Y'ALL'S PACKET, BUT IT JUST SHOWS THE SURVEY AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY, THE MAP OF THE PROPERTY, OR THE CONCEPT PLAN OF THE PROPERTY, AND THEN THE ORIGINAL IMPROVEMENTS THAT WERE DISCUSSED. I DON'T THINK WE HAVE THAT. NO, I'M PRESENTING IT AT THE DAIS FOR YOU GUYS. I CAN SHOW YOU, SHARE IT WITH YOU ALL. BUT IT'S THE THREE EXHIBITS IN THE BACK CAN PASS AROUND. BUT THERE'S NO CHANGE TO THE TEXT. CORRECT. EXHIBITS, JUST INCLUDING THE EXHIBITS IN THE BACK. WHAT THIS FACILITIES AGREEMENT IS, IT'S AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN US AND THE OWNER, DEVELOPER OF 100 CRESTVIEW, RELATED TO THE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE STIPULATED IN THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN FOR THE CITY. VICTORIA CAN KIND OF EXPLAIN IT BETTER THAN I, BUT THE GIST OF IT, THE SHORT VERSION OF IT, IS THAT THEY ARE ONLY REQUIRED TO FUND THEIR PROPORTIONAL SHARE, AND THIS AGREEMENT IS A NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT IDENTIFYING WHAT THAT ACTUALLY TRANSLATES TO IN TERMS OF DOLLARS, IN WHICH CASE IT'S THE AGREED UPON AMOUNT BETWEEN THE, THE OR. THE PROPOSED AMOUNT FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION IS $30,000. THAT WOULD GO TOWARDS THOSE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS AT MALLOY BRIDGE ROAD AND CRESTVIEW AND OR ALSO THE CAMERA IMPROVEMENTS THAT YOU WERE JUST DISCUSSING. IT COULD BE USED FOR EITHER PURPOSE. AND IF YOU WOULD LIKE, WE CAN DISCUSS IN EXECUTIVE SESSION TO RECEIVE LEGAL ADVICE IF YOU WOULD LIKE, OR I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE ABOUT THE AGREEMENT. AND ALSO WHEN YOU MAKE A MOTION ON THIS, IF YOU'RE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE IT, YOU'LL HAVE TO ALSO MAKE A MOTION THAT THE AMOUNT FOR THE INFRASTRUCTURE CONTRIBUTION PAYMENT BE $30,000, BECAUSE THERE'S A BLANK RIGHT NOW. THAT'S NUMBER 13, ISN'T IT? STILL I MOVE, WE APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 13 FOR AN AMOUNT OF $30,000. SECOND, YOUR MOTION. ALL IN FAVOR? ALL IN FAVOR. ALL IN FAVOR. OKAY. GOING NUMBER 14 DISCUSS AND CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPROVING EXECUTIVE NO NOTIFICATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SEAGOVILLE, TEXAS, AND GRIFFIN. WINTERTON SWINERTON LLC FOR PRIMARILY BETWEEN THE CITY OF SEAGOVILLE. TEXAS, AND GRIFFIN SWEENEY, LLC. 
          I'LL SAY IT AGAIN MASTER DEVELOPERS SERVICES RELATED TO THE PROPOSED PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP. CITY PARTNERSHIP, CITY HALL MUNICIPAL COMPLEX PROJECT TO AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT. GOOD EVENING MAYOR PRO TEM AND COUNCIL. THIS IS REALLY EXCITING ITEM. IT'S AN EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND GRIFFIN SWINERTON GRIFFIN. THEIR REPRESENTATIVES ARE HERE TONIGHT, AND I'LL CALL THEM UP IN JUST A MOMENT. BUT I WANTED TO JUST LET YOU KNOW ALL THE BACKGROUND WORK THAT STAFF HAS BEEN DOING ON THIS EVER SINCE I'VE BEEN HERE. THAT'S BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT A FUTURE CITY HALL IS, IS GOING TO BE A NEED OF THE CITY AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE. AND ONCE CARRIE 
          [01:00:06]
CAME ON BOARD, HE REALLY INITIATED THE PROCESS TO GET THAT BALL ROLLING. AND SO WE ISSUED THE CITY ISSUED A STATEMENT FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR MASTER DEVELOPERS TO COME IN AND, AND PROVIDE A PLAN FOR A P3 PROJECT THAT WOULD BE A PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROJECT. WE HAD MULTIPLE DIFFERENT ENTITIES THAT PROVIDED PROPOSALS FOR A P3 PROJECT AFTER THEIR REVIEW BY A SELECT COMMITTEE FOR IT, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT GRIFFIN SWINERTON WOULD BE THE BEST PARTNER FOR THIS PROJECT. THEY BRING A WEALTH OF EXPERIENCE, WHICH THEY'LL THEY'LL TALK ABOUT MORE IN JUST A MOMENT. AFTER THAT, WE BROUGHT FORWARD BEFORE YOU GUYS THE P3 PROJECT GUIDELINES THAT. WERE YOU OFFICIALLY APPROVED AT A MEETING EARLIER THIS YEAR? AND NOW WE'RE BRINGING FORTH AN EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENT. 
          AND SO AT A BIG PICTURE LEVEL, THE EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENT IDENTIFIES A NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT. THAT'S RIGHT, ABOUT $375,000. AND THOSE FUNDS WOULD BE USED TO COMPLETE REALLY THE DUE DILIGENCE WORK THAT'S REQUIRED FOR THE CITY TO BE ABLE TO IDENTIFY A POTENTIAL SITE FOR CITY HALL, AS WELL AS A NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND SEVERAL OTHER OF THE DILIGENCE ITEMS THAT ARE REQUIRED TO REALLY MAKE THIS A REALITY AND A REAL PROJECT. AND SO I'LL TURN IT OVER TO GRIFFIN SWINERTON IF Y'ALL WANT TO COME UP, WE HAVE YOUR PRESENTATION IN HERE AND YOU CAN USE THE REMOTE TO SLIDE THROUGH IT, SEE IF IT'S ON. THERE WE GO. OKAY, SO IT SHOULD ALL BE LOADED IN HERE AND I'LL TURN IT OVER TO YOU GUYS. OKAY. THANK YOU. AND GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS. MY NAME IS CORIN CRAWFORD. I'M THE EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT OF GRIFFIN SWINERTON AND I'M JEFF BLAKELY, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT FOR SWINERTON. AND THANK YOU FOR HAVING US THIS EVENING. IT'S A REAL PLEASURE TO. WE'RE EXCITED TO TO BE IN FRONT OF YOU AND TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT OUR FIRM, AS WELL AS THE AGREEMENT AND THE PROCESS UNDERWAY. WE LIKE TO START WITH THE GOALS. SO WE COMMENDED THE, YOU KNOW, THE CITY FOR THE THOUGHT THAT WENT INTO, YOU KNOW, THIS PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROCUREMENT, THE RFQ. WE SEE THIS ALL THE TIME. THIS IS WHAT WE LIVE AND BREATHE. AND SO WE WERE VERY HAPPY TO SEE A WELL THOUGHT OUT PROCUREMENT PROCESS. AND WE LIKE TO START WITH THE PROJECT'S GOALS AND OBJECTIVES THAT THE CITY BROUGHT FORWARD, BECAUSE WE THINK THAT THEY ARE SPOT ON FOR HOW TO SET THE TONE FOR A SUCCESSFUL PROJECT. SOME OF THE THINGS THAT STOOD OUT FOR US THAT OUR THAT OUR MODEL, WHICH WE'LL DESCRIBE, DOES, IS PROVIDES FOR A CIVIC LANDMARK. 
          WE ALWAYS SAY WE'RE HERE TO HELP CITIES FULFILL THE LEGACY PROJECT, AND TO DO SO IN A WAY THAT STRUCTURES A PARTNERSHIP MODEL THAT MINIMIZES THE CITY'S UPFRONT CASH OUTLAY WHILE MAINTAINING PUBLIC OWNERSHIP OF THE FACILITY, COMPLETING THE PROJECT WITHIN A MUTUALLY AGREED UPON BUDGET AND SCHEDULE THAT HAS OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY. AND AS A MODERN FACILITY. 
          THAT'S REALLY KEY TO OUR PROPOSAL. AND IT WAS VERY ELEMENTAL INTO HOW WE THINK ABOUT WHAT A P3 IS. IN GENERAL, THE WORD P3 IS PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP. BUT FOR US, THE THREE P'S OF P3 REALLY IS PEOPLE, PROCESS AND PERFORMANCE. AND BY ALIGNING ALL THAT TOGETHER, OUR PASSION IS ABOUT HELPING A CITY FULFILL ITS LEGACY. AND SO AGAIN, PEOPLE PROCESS PERFORMANCE. THIS IS OUR OUR PRESENTATION HERE STRUCTURED JUST LIKE THAT, WHERE WE START OFF WITH A LITTLE INTRODUCTION OF GRIFFIN SWINERTON AND OURSELVES. AND THEN THE PROCESS AND PERFORMANCE IS REALLY FOCUSED ON YOUR PROJECT. SO THE PEOPLE. 
          GRIFFIN SWINERTON IS A DEVELOPMENT PLATFORM. THIS IS GIVES YOU A HIGH LEVEL OVERVIEW OF OUR. TRACK RECORD. YOU KNOW, WE HAVE WE DO THIS, WE LIVE AND BREATHE THIS, YOU KNOW, OUR GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PIPELINE RIGHT NOW THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY IS OVER $1.2 BILLION, $530 MILLION ACTIVE PROJECTS HERE IN TEXAS. AS WE SPEAK, WE'RE BACKED BY OUR OUR PARTNER IS A LARGE VOLUME GENERAL CONTRACTOR. THAT AGAIN, IS A $5 BILLION A YEAR CONTRACTOR. AND SO THIS SLIDE IS JUST TO ILLUSTRATE THE TRACK RECORD. BUT WHAT THE NUMBERS ON THE PAGE DON'T SHOW IS THE, THE, THE VALUES AND THE PASSION THAT WE BRING TO THIS WORK WHERE WE, WE, WE ARE REALLY ABOUT GETTING TO KNOW A CITY, GETTING THESE MUNICIPAL FACILITIES DESIGNED AND BUILT IN A WAY THAT IS ORGANIC TO THE CITY. OUR WHOLE PROCESS IS ABOUT GETTING TO KNOW FOLKS, AND WE DON'T HAVE A COOKIE CUTTER APPROACH. WE DO SOMETHING THAT IS, LIKE I SAID, 
          [01:05:01]
PART OF THE DNA FOR THIS SPECIFIC REGION. WE'RE A FAMILY OF COMPANIES ON THE LEFT HAND SLIDE. IT JUST SHOWS THAT GRIFFIN SWINERTON, AS A DEVELOPER IS AN EXTENSION OF OUR ESSENTIALLY OUR PARENT COMPANY, SWINERTON BUILDERS. AND JEFF BLAKELY IS HERE AS MY COLLEAGUE TO JUST SHOW THAT WE'RE ONE AND THE SAME. SWINERTON IS A BUILDER. GRIFFIN SWINERTON ON THE DEVELOPMENT SIDE, WE'RE ALL PARTNERED WITH IT ALL, AND WE'VE DEVELOPED A TEAM THAT IS A BESPOKE TEAM. WE'RE A SINGLE POINT OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CITY AS A DEVELOPER. WE BROUGHT IN OUR DESIGN PARTNERS, OUR BUILD PARTNERS. GARVER IS OUR CIVIL ENGINEER. WE'VE WORKED WITH GARVER ON MANY PROJECTS, P3 PROJECTS THROUGHOUT TEXAS, AND WE SEE IT AS A BENEFIT THAT GARVER ALSO HAS A RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CITY, AS WELL AS FINANCIAL ADVISORS WHO DO HELP US STRUCTURE OUR PROJECTS. HERE'S AN OVERVIEW JUST PICTORIALLY OF THE PROJECT EXPERIENCE THAT WE HAVE THROUGH TEXAS. WE'RE UNDERWAY WITH A LARGE CIVIC CENTER FOR THE CITY OF PFLUGERVILLE, RIGHT OUTSIDE OF TEXAS. WE'VE BEEN IN ON THE MCKINNEY AIRPORT FOR SEVERAL YEARS NOW, EXPANDING THEIR AIRPORT, THE SALINA GOVERNMENT CENTER, AS WELL AS A A MUNICIPAL COMPLEX FOR THE CITY OF ROWLETT. SO I'LL TRY TO GET THROUGH THIS QUICKLY. I JUST WANTED TO ILLUSTRATE TO YOU PROJECTS THAT WE HAVE UNDERWAY. 
          THEY HELP INFORM HOW WE. WHAT COULD BE TO COME FOR A PROJECT LIKE THIS. ONE CASE STUDY IS THE DOWNTOWN EAST PROJECT IN PFLUGERVILLE. IT'S A 40 ACRE PROJECT IN TOTAL WHERE THE MASTER DEVELOPERS OF THAT 40 ACRES IN, IN. IN RED, YOU SEE A SITE THAT IS EAST OF DOWNTOWN IN THE LOWER LEFT HAND SIDE OF THE SLIDE THAT IS THE HISTORIC DOWNTOWN. AND OUR WORK IS TO EXTEND THE MAIN STREET OF PFLUGERVILLE AND THE HISTORIC DOWNTOWN THROUGH SEVERAL OTHER LAND ASSEMBLAGES AND THROUGH THE 30 ACRE, YOU KNOW, THE TEN ACRES ARE THE LAND ASSEMBLAGES BETWEEN THE RED BOX AND THE HISTORIC DOWNTOWN, WITH THE 30 ACRE SITE THERE. THE MASTER PLAN THAT WE DID INVOLVES BUILDING A CENTRAL CIVIC CAMPUS OR PLAZA BUILT AROUND THEIR NEW CITY HALL, A RECREATION CENTER. THIS IS TEXAS'S SECOND LARGE. IT IS TO BE TEXAS'S SECOND LARGEST RECREATION CENTER AND WRAPPED BY A PARKING STRUCTURE AND FUTURE MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS A PHOTO, AN AERIAL OF OUR PROJECT IN PROGRESS. NOW THIS IS AS OF LAST MONTH. AND YOU CAN SEE YOU KNOW HOW THE MASTER PLAN IS TAKING PLACE. THE RECREATION CENTER WELL UNDERWAY, THE CITY HALL UNDERWAY, PARKING STRUCTURE, PLAZA SITE AND ADDITIONAL SITES FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. THERE'S AN AERIAL OF THE OF THE CITY HALL UNDERWAY. THAT'S A RENDERING OF WHAT THE COMPLETED FACILITY WILL LOOK LIKE. AND WE ALWAYS BELIEVE THAT THE A NEW CITY HALL SHOULD BE A PLACE THAT OPENS UP TO THE COMMUNITY. SO WE PUT IN A CO-WORKING SPACE AND A CAFE IN ADDITION TO A STATE OF THE ART COUNCIL CHAMBERS AND AND VARIOUS ENTRY PLAZAS FOR BEING AN INVITING NEW ENVIRONMENT. THE RECREATION CENTER, THAT'S A PROGRESS PHOTO IN JUNE OF 26 OF OUR RECREATION CENTER OR THE CITY'S RECREATION CENTER. AND THIS IS WHAT IT WILL LOOK LIKE AS COMPLETED WITH POOL, BIG GYM, A TURF GATHERING SPACE IN THE MIDDLE. THAT'S A PHOTO OF THE PLAZA. AND WE'RE ALSO BUILDING RETAIL THERE. SO WE HAVE A MIXED USE RECREATION CENTER WHERE AGAIN, WE BELIEVE THAT WE'RE GOING TO ACTIVATE THE A FACILITY. AND WE THINK THAT THE MODERN WAY TO THINK ABOUT PUBLIC FACILITIES IS TO TRY TO MAKE THEM AS ACTIVE AND INTERACTIVE WITH THE COMMUNITY AS POSSIBLE. PARKING STRUCTURE. SO FROM A PROCESS STANDPOINT, WE'RE HERE IN FRONT OF YOU WITH A THREE STEP PROCESS. KIRK LAID OUT THE AGREEMENT THAT'S IN FRONT OF YOU TODAY IS AN EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENT. WE REALLY WANTED TO START A PROCESS OF NEGOTIATION AND FURTHER REFINING THE CONCEPT WITH THE CITY. AND AND WE ENVISION THAT PROCESS TO BE A 3 OR 4 MONTH PROCESS. THE DUE DILIGENCE AND CONCEPT DESIGN WORK IS INITIAL BUDGET OF ABOUT 375,000 THAT WE HAVE SAID THAT WE THAT WE WOULD BE ADVANCING. THIS IS TYPICAL WITH A LOT OF OUR PROJECTS. WE WOULD ADVANCE THE PREDEVELOPMENT FUNDS SUBJECT TO TERMS WITH THE CITY. 
          IF THE PROJECT DOESN'T GO FORWARD, THEIR TERMS WOULD. THOSE ARE REIMBURSED, BUT WE ARE GETTING THE PROJECT JUMPSTARTED BY ADVANCING THE FUNDS AND. AND THE IDEA IS THAT WE WOULD FINALIZE OUR CONCEPT AFTER 3 OR 4 MONTHS AND COME BACK TO TO YOU FOR A DECISION ON FURTHER STEPS INTO A PREDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. YOU CAN THINK OF THE PREDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AS THE MUCH MORE INVOLVED SCHEMATIC DESIGN AND DESIGN DEVELOPMENT TO REACH A 
          [01:10:06]
GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE. AND THEN THE THIRD PHASE IS TO COMPLETE THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND BUILD THE FACILITY. EACH STEP PROVIDES A CHECK IN AN OFF RAMP. YOU KNOW, IT'S JUST TO SAY, DO YOU LIKE US? ARE WE DOING WHAT WE SAID WE'D DO? AND DO YOU LIKE WHERE THE DIRECTION OF THE PROJECT IS GOING? AND IF SO, WE GET TO MOVE ON TO THE NEXT STEP. IF NOT, THEN THEN, YOU KNOW, WE'LL WE HAVEN'T REALLY GOTTEN TO THAT YET. BUT, YOU KNOW, LIKE I SAID, IT'S ALWAYS YOUR, YOUR DECISION FOR WHETHER WE'RE MEETING ALL OF OUR OBLIGATIONS AND IF YOU'RE SATISFIED. AND THAT GETS US TO THE NEXT PHASE. SO TYPICALLY, I, YOU KNOW, THE, THE PRE-DEVELOPMENT PHASE IS WORK THAT A CITY WOULD HAVE TO DO ANYWAY. YOU KNOW, IT HAS TO DO CERTAIN LEVELS OF DESIGN TO GET TO A POINT WHERE YOU HAVE SOMETHING THAT YOU CAN DELIVER A GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE FOR THE GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE THAT WE OFFER BASICALLY MEANS THAT ONCE WE REACH THAT COST, ANY COST OVERRUNS OR SCHEDULE DELAYS ARE ON US. IT'S A GUARANTEE. AND WE AND WE HAVE A GOOD TRACK RECORD OF THAT. IN MCKINNEY. WE COMPLETED OUR EXPANSION OF THE AIRPORT TWO MONTHS AHEAD OF SCHEDULE, AND ACTUALLY RETURNED 900,000 OF SAVINGS BACK TO THE CITY. SO WE WE REALLY BELIEVE IN A P THREE AS BEING SOMETHING THAT IS ABOUT BRINGING IN THE BEST OF PRIVATE SECTOR EXPERTISE, YOU KNOW, ADVANCING FUNDS, GUARANTEEING OUR WORK. AND, AND WE ALWAYS STRIVE TO EXCEED THOSE EXPECTATIONS. AND WE HAVE NUMEROUS EXAMPLES OF WHERE WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO ACHIEVE THAT. AFTER WE SET THE GMP IN STAGE THREE, THAT'S WHERE WE GET TO A POINT WHERE WE ARE NOW PRESENTED WITH A VARIETY OF DIFFERENT FINANCING OPTIONS AND UNDERTAKE THE BULK OF THE PROJECT. AND AS I SAID AGAIN, ANY, ANY, YOU KNOW, ANY, ANY, IT'S A DATE CERTAIN. IT'S A GUARANTEED COST, A PROPOSITION THAT, THAT WE DELIVER TO THE CITY. AND SO REALLY, AS A RECAP, IN SUMMARY, WHAT A WHAT IS A PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP? WELL, WE LIKE TO REALLY TALK ABOUT WHAT IT'S NOT THE MODEL THAT WE PUT FORTH IS NOT PRIVATIZATION. WE AS A DEVELOPER ARE NOT SAYING WE ARE GOING TO PRIVATIZE ANY GOVERNMENT ASSETS. THE MODEL KEEPS OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL IN THE CITY'S HANDS. WE'RE NOT YOUR LANDLORD. WE HAVE A MODEL WHERE WE'RE FEE DEVELOPERS, AND WE MORE THAN PAY FOR OURSELVES IN ANY FEES BY OFFSETTING A VARIETY OF COSTS THAT THE CITY WOULD HAVE TO PAY FOR IN OTHER WAYS. YOU DON'T NEED A CONSTRUCTION MANAGER, YOU DON'T NEED AN OWNER'S CONTINGENCY, AND YOU SAVE LOTS OF MONEY AND JUST SIMPLE COST INFLATION. THE FASTER WE GO, THAT SAVES THE CITY MONEY WITH A MORE EXPENSIVE PROJECT THAT THAT JUST ESCALATED THROUGH INFLATION. WE ARE SO. AND AS SUCH, OUR MODEL IS NOT PUTTING IN EXPENSIVE PRIVATE CAPITAL. WHAT WE DO IS WE SET UP, YOU KNOW, KIND OF PROJECT SPECIFIC LOCAL GOVERNMENT CORPORATIONS, PUBLIC FACILITY CORPORATIONS THAT FINANCE USING TAX EXEMPT DEBT, THE, THE LOWEST COST OF CAPITAL THAT'S OUT THERE IS TAX EXEMPT FINANCING. AND WE THINK THAT $1 MORE YOU SPEND ON FINANCING IS $1 LESS YOU SPEND ON PROGRAM. SO WE ALWAYS LIKE TO GET PROJECTS FINANCED WITH TAX EXEMPT FUNDS. SO THIS IS NOT A SITUATION WHERE YOU'RE LOSING ANY CONTROL. AND THE BENEFITS OF OUR MODEL INCLUDE ALL THOSE THINGS THAT YOU SEE TICKED BELOW THERE. PUBLIC OWNERSHIP, PRIVATE SECTOR EXPERTISE. YOU KNOW, WE'LL MINIMIZE YOUR UPFRONT CASH OUTLAY SO THAT THE PROJECT CAN GET ACCELERATED COST SAVINGS THROUGH ACCELERATED PROJECT DELIVERY. AND OUR CONTRACT STIPULATES THAT ANY LINE ITEM SAVINGS GET RETURNED BACK TO THE CITY. WE EXPAND THE TOOL SET FOR FUNDING OPTIONS THAT ARE AVAILABLE, AND WE REALLY OPERATE AS AN EXTENSION OF CITY STAFF. SO, JEFF, DO YOU HAVE ANY THINGS YOU WANTED TO ADD? NO, I JUST SAY, I MEAN, ANOTHER WAY TO LOOK AT THIS IS REALLY JUST INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY. I MEAN, WE'RE BRINGING THE COMPREHENSIVE WHAT WE BELIEVE TO BE THE BEST IN CLASS TEAM FOR PROJECTS LIKE THIS. AND LIKE CORA MENTIONED TOO, WE GOT SO EXCITED WHEN WE ORIGINALLY SAW THE RFQ YOU PUT OUT BECAUSE A LOT OF THESE LANGUAGES WAS, WAS, WAS IN THE RFQ THAT WAS PUT OUT. AND SO IT JUST ALIGNS PERFECTLY WITH OUR MODEL. BUT AGAIN, AT THE END OF THE DAY, BY CREATING THIS INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY, TO ME, THE CORE BENEFIT IS JUST MITIGATING RISK FOR THE CITY, WHICH A LOT OF TIMES IS, ARE THE COST OVERRUNS OR THE SCHEDULE DELAYS. WE'RE BASICALLY BRINGING, YOU KNOW, OUR EXPERTISE AND OUR EXPERIENCE IN THIS REALM OF DELIVERING CIVIC, YOU KNOW, PROJECTS ALL ACROSS THE COUNTRY A LOT HERE IN TEXAS AND BRINGING THOSE BEST PRACTICES TO THE CITY TO BEAR. SO WE, AGAIN, APPRECIATE YOU HAVING US THIS EVENING. HAPPY TO ANSWER 
          [01:15:03]
ANY QUESTIONS, BUT WE REALLY THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION. I APPRECIATE IT. 
          THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. THAT WAS A GREAT PRESENTATION FROM THEM. AND I JUST WANT TO RECAP NOW ON A COUPLE OF THINGS. SO THE EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENT IS THE VERY, VERY, VERY FIRST PHASE OF THIS WHOLE PROCESS. OBVIOUSLY, IT'S A REALLY BIG PROJECT AND IT'S A REALLY BIG PROCESS. BUT WHAT'S INCLUDED IN THIS IS A NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF IT'S ABOUT $376,000 OVER THE NEXT 4 TO 6 MONTHS, WE'RE GOING TO WORK WITH GRIFFIN SWINERTON TO DEVELOP BASICALLY LIKE A MASTER PLAN FOR WHERE A NEW CITY HALL WOULD GO, HOW BIG IT WOULD NEED TO BE, WHAT SITE MAKES THE MOST SENSE, WHETHER THE EARTH IS EARTHWORK, THERE IS GOING TO BE GOOD. THE GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS ARE GOOD. ALL OF THE DUE DILIGENCE. WE HAVE TO HAVE A ACTUAL, ACTUAL, ACTIONABLE PLAN OF HOW TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS TYPE OF PROJECT. AT THAT TIME, GRIFFIN SWINERTON WILL COME BACK. THEY'LL PRESENT THIS REPORT, THIS PLAN TO YOU GUYS HAVE AN IDENTIFIED SITE IN MIND. WE'LL DO THAT SOMETIME EITHER DECEMBER OR JANUARY. TIME FRAME IS WHAT WE WOULD PROBABLY BE LOOKING AT ONCE THEY COMPLETE THAT DUE DILIGENCE WORK. IN THE EVENT Y'ALL WANT TO MOVE FORWARD, THAT $375,000 WOULD GET ROLLED FORWARD TO THE NEXT PHASE OF THAT PREDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. IN THE EVENT THAT YOU DECIDE NOT TO MOVE FORWARD FOR WHATEVER REASON, THEN THAT'S WHEN WE WOULD PAY OUT THAT $375,000 OUT TO THEM. BUT EVEN THEN, IN THAT SCENARIO, WE STILL WOULD HAVE A MASTER PLAN THAT WE COULD TAKE AND PUT INTO ACTION IN SOME TYPE OF WAY. SO AGAIN, HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU GUYS MAY HAVE ON IT. NOPE. I MOVE WE APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 14. SECOND YOUR MOTION, SIR. ALL IN FAVOR? THANK YOU KIRK. THANK YOU GUYS. THANK YOU. NUMBER 15 DISCUSS A RESOLUTION APPROVING ADOPTING A JOINT CITY OF SEAGOVILLE IN SEAGOVILLE ECONOMICAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE POLICY. GOOD EVENING. SO THIS IS AN ITEM THAT WAS CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD AT A PREVIOUS MEETING. YOU ALL HAVE PROBABLY NOTICED I BROUGHT A FEW DIFFERENT POLICIES TO YOU OVER THE PAST FEW MONTHS. WE'RE TRYING TO PUT A INTO WRITING OUR POLICIES AND PROCEDURES THAT WE EXPECT FOR ANY TYPE OF INCENTIVE. EXCUSE ME. IN THIS CASE, WE EXCUSE ME, WITH ALL THESE POLICIES FOR INCENTIVES, IT'S VERY MUCH VARIES ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS. AND SO OUR UTMOST PRIORITY IS MAINTAINING OUR OWN FLEXIBILITY. 
          BUT THAT SAID, WE WANT WE DO WANT TO PROVIDE A ROADMAP TO APPLICANTS OF WHAT THE PROCESS LOOKS LIKE, THE TYPICAL TOOLS THAT WE PREFER TO USE AND KIND OF WHAT THEY CAN EXPECT FROM US. 
          AND SO THAT'S WHAT THIS AGREEMENT IS NOT AN AGREEMENT. THIS POLICY IS IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE CAN PUT ON OUR WEBSITE SO THAT POTENTIAL DEVELOPERS CAN LOOK AT IT AND SEE, OKAY, THIS IS WHAT I NEED TO DO TO SUBMIT A REQUEST TO THE CITY. AND THEN THE CITY STILL MAINTAINS FULL FLEXIBILITY BASED ON THE SPECIFICS OF ANY PROJECT. SO I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT AGENDA ITEM 15. ALL IN FAVOR? NUMBER 16 SECOND READING DISCUSS CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPROVING CITY BUDGET AND ADOPTED BY THE DC BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1ST, 2026 AND ENDING ON SEPTEMBER 30TH, 2027. SO AT THE PREVIOUS MEETING, THE DC BOARD APPROVED OUR BUDGET, THE BUDGET FOR THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR. THIS HAS TO BE DONE BEFORE THE CITY CONSIDERS ITS OWN BUDGET, BECAUSE IT'S A COMPONENT COMPONENT UNIT PART OF IT. THE TWO HIGHLIGHTS THAT I WOULD HAVE BASED ON THE SUMMARY THAT YOU ALL HAVE IN YOUR PACKETS, THERE IS A BIG CAPITAL EXPENDITURE. SO IF YOU'RE LOOKING OR WE DO HAVE A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF EXPENDITURES, THAT'S BECAUSE THERE'S A BIG PROJECT THAT WE'RE ANTICIPATING. WE'VE HAD EARLY NEGOTIATIONS. WE'RE ANTICIPATING THAT WE'LL END UP MAKING A PAYMENT IN FISCAL IN THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR TOWARDS THIS PROJECT. NOTHING HAS BEEN APPROVED IN WRITING AT THIS TIME, BUT WE THOUGHT IT PRUDENT TO GO AHEAD AND BUDGET FOR THAT EXPENDITURE. AND SO AS THAT PROJECT BECOMES. MORE IS PUT INTO WRITING MORE, IT'LL GO BEFORE THE CDC BOARD FOR APPROVAL, AND THEN IT WILL ALSO GO BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL AND RATIFICATION. BUT THAT'S WHAT REPRESENTS THE LION'S SHARE OF THOSE EXPENDITURES ABOVE REVENUES. WE HAVE A HEALTHY FUND BALANCE. IT'S AN EXCITING PROJECT. WE'LL WE'LL SHARE MORE WITH IT AS WE 
          [01:20:02]
GET CLOSER TO REALITY. BUT I JUST WANTED TO POINT THAT PART OUT. MOVE. WE APPROVE ITEM NUMBER 16. SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR. NUMBER 17. READ, DISCUSS AND CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPROVING AN EDC CONTRACT WITH TEXAS LAKE WALLS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED 400,000. AUTHORIZING EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE ALL NECESSARY AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. AGAIN, THIS IS ANOTHER ITEM THAT WAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD AT THEIR PREVIOUS BOARD MEETING FOR THIS ONE. 
          THIS REPRESENTS OUR QUALITY OF LIFE PROJECT FOR THIS FISCAL YEAR, AND ALSO FOR THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR. DURING THE BUDGET PROCESS FOR THE EDC LAST YEAR, IN LIEU OF DOING AN ACTUAL PARK IMPROVEMENT AT BRUCE CENTRAL PARK, WHICH IS WHAT WE'VE DONE THE PAST FEW YEARS, THE BOARD'S DIRECTION WAS TO GO AHEAD AND DO OUR DUE DILIGENCE WORK ON THE POND ITSELF AT BRUCE CENTRAL PARK. THERE'S BEEN EROSION ISSUES THERE THAT HAVE BEEN SLOW ROLLING, BUT NOTICEABLE OVER THE YEARS, AND THE BOARD'S DIRECTION OR DESIRE WAS TO FIX THAT ISSUE OF THE EROSION BEFORE PUTTING ANY ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS AT BRUCE CENTRAL PARK. AND SO STAFF WENT TO DO THAT DUE DILIGENCE. WE'VE BEEN DOING IT SINCE OCTOBER. I'VE BEEN WORKING WITH PUBLIC WORKS VERY CLOSELY ON IT. INITIALLY, WE THOUGHT WE MIGHT NEED A CONCRETE RETAINING WALL AROUND THE POND. WHAT WAS ULTIMATELY DETERMINED IS THAT WE JUST NEED A METAL RETAINING WALL, LIKE YOU WOULD SEE AT PROMINENT LAKES ACROSS TEXAS. WE REQUESTED PROPOSALS FROM MULTIPLE DIFFERENT VENDORS FOR THE FOR THE CONTRACT. FOR THE PROJECT, WE. TEXAS LAKE WALLS HAD THE BEST PROPOSAL BY FAR. AND SO INITIALLY WE THOUGHT WE MAY HAVE TO PHASE IT OR WE MAY FUND ONLY THE ENGINEERING. BUT THEIR PROJECT WAS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF WHAT THE CDC CAN DO. AND SO BY THE TIMING WORKED OUT REALLY WELL FOR US TO FUND HALF OF IT IN THIS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR AND THEN THE OTHER HALF IN THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR. AND IT CUTS PRETTY NEATLY TO THE AMOUNTS THAT WE WOULD NORMALLY BUDGET. YOU MAY NOTICE IN THE AGENDA MEMO THE CONTRACTORS FOR AROUND $340,000, BUT THE NOT TO EXCEED IN THE AND THE RESOLUTION ITSELF IS FOR $400,000. THAT'S BECAUSE THE PRICE OF METAL CHANGES QUITE A BIT. WE DO TYPICALLY INCLUDE A CONTINGENCY IN THE PROPOSALS WE BRING BEFORE YOU IN CASE THERE'S CHANGE ORDERS IN THE FUTURE, BUT WE KNOW THAT THE PRICE OF METAL IS VERY PARTICULAR. AND SO THE QUOTE FOR THE 340 WAS FROM EARLY MAY, GETTING IT READY FOR THE EDC AGENDAS. AND SO THAT PRICE MAY HAVE FLUCTUATED A LITTLE BIT. EITHER WAY, WE'LL ONLY FUND UP TO THE $400,000 OR THE ACTUAL AMOUNT OF THE COST, WHICH I EXPECT TO COME IN FAR BELOW 400. 
          BUT WE JUST WANTED TO HAVE AMPLE CONTINGENCY. AND THIS GOES ALL THE WAY AROUND THE POND. YES, SIR. WE'LL DO THE WHOLE THING. SO IF WE NEED TO GET IN THERE, WE HAVE ACCESS TO GO IN AND OUT SOMEWHERE. IF WE PUT THIS AROUND THE POND, I DON'T THINK IT'S GOING TO GO WHERE IT GOES UNDER THE ROADWAY. FROM WHERE THE DISCHARGE FROM THE HIGHWAY. IT'S NOT GOING TO BLOCK THAT. THAT'S GOING TO BE OPEN. I THINK THEY'RE GOING TO LEAVE THE RIPRAP, RIGHT? YEAH, IT'S GOING TO GO RIGHT UP TO THE EDGE OF THE POND, AND THEN IT'LL GO ALL THE WAY AROUND IT. 
          AND THEY WILL HAVE METAL WALLS ALL THE WAY UP TO THE TO THE ROADWAY. AND ALL THE OLD RIPRAP WILL BE REMOVED. CORRECT? NO, I THINK THEY SAID THEY WERE GOING TO BURY IT. RIGHT. I DON'T THINK THEY'RE GOING TO. WELL YEAH IT WAS, IT WOULDN'T HAVE TO BE HAULED UP. YEAH. YOU'RE RIGHT. BURIED SOMEWHERE. YEAH. BURIED. OKAY I MOVE WE APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 17. SECOND YOUR MOTION. ALL IN FAVOR? NUMBER 18, SECOND READING. DISCUSS. CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPROVING THE EDC ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT WITH ONWARD SUBS. 
          SEAGOVILLE IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED 120 000 FOR NECESSARY SITE IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO TAKE SUCH FURTHER ACTION AND SIGN SUCH DOCUMENTS AS NECESSARY FOR SAID AGREEMENT. MR. KIRK, WE HAVE AN EXCITING NEW VENDOR THAT'S WANTING TO COME TO SEAGOVILLE. THIS WAS AN AGREEMENT WITH THEIR OWNERSHIP OR OWNERSHIP GROUP FOR IT. THIS WOULD THIS STAGECOACH COMPANY WOULD BE COMING. AND THE STRIP CENTER WHERE AT&T IS AND BURGER POP AND NAPOLI'S IN THERE. AT&T IS REDUCING THEIR SQUARE FOOTAGE. AND SO THERE'S ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE AVAILABLE, BUT IT'S NOT SUITED FOR A RESTAURANT. AND SO THERE ARE CERTAIN SITE IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BRING TO TO BRING THE RESTAURANT HERE. 
          THIS AGREEMENT AND SPECIFICALLY IS STRUCTURED IN TWO DIFFERENT WAYS. THERE'S A $80,000 GRANT THAT IS UP ESSENTIALLY UPFRONT. THEY'LL HAVE TO PUT IN THE INFRASTRUCTURE AND PROVIDE RECEIPTS BACK TO US, BUT ON THE FRONT END OF THINGS, THEY'LL GET REIMBURSED FOR SOME OF 
          [01:25:03]
THOSE UPFRONT COSTS. AND THEN THE REMAINING $40,000 IS VIA SALES TAX GRANTS OR REBATES THAT WOULD GO BACK OUT TO THE DEVELOPER BASED ON THE SALES TAX THAT THEY PERFORM. SO THE OTHER $40,000 WOULD GET PAID OUT OVER TEN YEARS BASED STRICTLY ON THE SALES TAX THAT THEY ARE PRODUCING. WILL THIS BE LIKE A TAKEOUT SITUATION ONLY? NO, THEY'LL HAVE SOME DINING SPACE INSIDE. I WILL SAY THE MAJORITY OF THEIR BUSINESS IS TAKEOUT. SO THERE'S NOT A TON OF DINING ON THE DINING TABLES ON THE INSIDE, BUT THERE IS ROOM FOR PEOPLE TO EAT THERE. 
          SO IT'S KIND OF LIKE A BURGER POP. YOU GOT PLENTY OF ROOM TO SIT DOWN. AND YEAH, THAT'S THAT'S PROBABLY ABOUT RIGHT. YES, SURE. IT'S A 1200 SQUARE FOOT FACILITY. SO IT'S NOT A SUPER LARGE ONE MOVE. WE APPROVE ITEM 18 SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR. NUMBER 19 SECOND READING. 
          DISCUSS AND CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPROVING AND RATIFYING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S EXCLUSION IN AN EDC CONTRACT WITH PERFECT FINISH LANDSCAPING FOR LAWN CARE SERVICES OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2108 NORTH U.S. HIGHWAY 175, IN AMOUNT, NOT TO EXCEED $7,500 ANNUALLY. 
          AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE ALL NECESSARY AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 
          ALL RIGHT, LAST ITEM. SO AS YOU ARE ALL AWARE, THE CITY RECENTLY APPROVED A CONTRACT WITH PERFECT PERFECT FINISH LANDSCAPING FOR MAINTENANCE SERVICES AND LAWN CARE SERVICES ACROSS THE CITY. THE CDC IS A SEPARATE ENTITY TECHNICALLY FROM THAT AGREEMENT. AND SO WE WEREN'T A PARTY TO IT. BUT WE DO HAVE PROPERTY ABOUT FIVE ACRES RIGHT OFF THE HIGHWAY THAT NEEDS LAWN CARE SERVICES. AND SO WE'D PREVIOUSLY DONE THAT WITH A DIFFERENT VENDOR. I REQUESTED A NEW PROPOSAL FROM THEM AND FROM PERFECT FINISH, GIVEN THAT I KNEW THE CITY HAD JUST APPROVED THE CONTRACT WITH US. WITH THEM, PERFECT FINISH CONTRACT WAS MUCH SUPERIOR. AND SO I WENT AHEAD AND APPROVED OR SIGNED A CONTRACT WITH THEM. AND THE CDC RATIFIED THAT ACTION. JUST GIVEN THAT THE GRASS IS GETTING REALLY TALL, REALLY TALL. SO WE KIND OF NEEDED TO TAKE SOME ACTION ON IT TO GET IT INTO COMPLIANCE WITH CODE. AND SO THAT'S WHY WE WENT AHEAD AND APPROVED IT. BUT WE'RE ASKING FOR OR I'M ASKING FOR Y'ALL TO RATIFY THAT DECISION TO ARE WE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CODE? WE SHOULD BE NOW. THEY'VE WON IT. YEAH, I THOUGHT WE WERE. I THOUGHT WE INCLUDED THIS IN THAT WITH PERFECT FINISH. THIS SIX ACRES WAS SEPARATE FROM THEM. SEPARATE FROM THAT ONE I MOVE, WE APPROVE ITEM. HOLD ON ONE SECOND. SO IS THIS JUST A ONE TIME THING? IS THIS A CONTINUOUS THING THAT IT'LL BE FOR THE YEAR? THE 7500 IS FOR I THINK IT'S 16. MOZ IS WHAT WE BUDGETED FOR. AND SO ROUGHLY, THEY'LL KNOW ONCE A MONTH ON THAT SITE. AND THEN WE HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF CONTINGENCY FUNDING IN CASE, YOU KNOW, GRASS GROWS PRETTY QUICK AND WE NEED 2 OR 3 MOWS SO WE DON'T HAVE A SET BUDGET FOR THEM TO JUST CONTINUOUSLY. I THINK THE QUOTE WAS FOR 550 PER MOW. I THINK THAT'S ABOUT WHAT IT WAS. THEY DID TELL ME THE FIRST MOW WAS GOING TO BE MORE EXPENSIVE, JUST BECAUSE THE GRASS WAS SO HIGH. THEY WERE GOING TO HAVE TO COME IN AND DO IT TWICE. I TOLD THEM WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY ISSUES WITH THAT. MOVE. WE APPROVE ITEM 18, SECOND 19, GUYS 19. WE SAID, CHANGE THAT TO ITEM 19. SECOND. THANK YOU ALL. THANKS, KURT. ON NUMBER 20, CONSIDER RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A ONE TIME LUMP SUM EMPLOYMENT, RECORD RECOGNITION AND RETENTION PAYMENT FOR PATROL OFFICERS. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR PRO TEM MEMBERS OF COUNCIL. I BELIEVE THERE'S SOME. SOME ISSUES THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS AND PROVIDE LEGAL ADVICE AND EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR THIS ITEM. I'LL TURN IT OVER TO VICTORIA. 
          YEAH. AND SO IF SOMEONE WOULD BE INTERESTED IN RECEIVING LEGAL ADVICE, JUST MAKE A MOTION TO CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO RECONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION. FOR THE ESSENCE OF TIME, WOULD WE ALSO GO AHEAD AND TALK ABOUT THE EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEM WHILE WE'RE THERE? YES WE COULD. SORRY. YES, WE COULD DO THAT. SO MAYOR PRO TEM, IF YOU WANT TO, WE COULD ALSO CONVENE FOR ITEM 24 AS WELL. THEY'RE BOTH UNDER 551.071. EXECUTIVE SESSION BACK TO REGULAR SESSIONT 840. MAYOR PRO TEM, I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ITEM 20 WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS. THE ONE TIME LUMP SUM PAYMENT AMOUNT WILL BE $2,000. IT WILL 
          [01:30:04]
BE AVAILABLE TO ANY LICENSED PEACE OFFICER RATHER THAN PATROL OFFICER, EXCEPT POLICE CHIEF AND FIRE MARSHAL, WHO HAS BEEN EMPLOYED FOR TWO YEARS OR MORE AS OF OCTOBER 1ST, 2025 AND CONTINUES TO BE EMPLOYED AS OF AUGUST 1ST, 2026. YEAH, THE PAY WILL PAY WILL GO OUT AUGUST 1ST. YEP. THERE IS A MOTION, SIR. ALL IN FAVOR? THANK YOU. WE'RE DOWN TO NUMBER 21. 
          DISCUSS AND CONSIDER RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF NOTICE TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES. 
          CERTIFICATES. CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION FOR DESIGN. ACQUISITION, ACQUISITION, ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION AND IMPROVEMENT OF CERTAIN PUBLIC WORKS AND AUTHORIZING CERTAIN MATTERS RELATED THEREFOR THERETO. MAYOR PRO TEM MEMBERS OF COUNCIL. THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION IS TO AUTHORIZE PUBLICATION OF THE CITY'S NOTICE OF INTENT TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING THE DESIGN, ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, FURNISHING AND EQUIPPING OF THE NEW SEAGOVILLE CENTRAL FIRE STATION AND RELATED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. STATE LAW REQUIRES THE CITY PUBLISH A NOTICE PRIOR TO ISSUING CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION. THE PROPOSED ISSUANCE IS NOT TO EXCEED THE 7.9 $7.5 MILLION AMOUNT FIGURE AMOUNT FOR PROJECT PLANNING PURPOSES, WITH ACCOMPANYING RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF THE REQUIRED NOTICES AND RELATED PROCEDURAL ACTIONS. ISSUANCE COSTS WILL BE PAID FROM THE BOND PROCEEDS AND DO NOT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL BUDGETED FUNDS. APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM INITIATES THE STATUTORY NOTICE PROCESS AND DOES NOT AUTHORIZE THE ISSUANCE OF DEBT AT THIS PARTICULAR MEETING. FINAL AUTHORIZATION WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AT A FUTURE MEETING FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF ALL LEGAL NOTICE REQUIREMENTS. THAT CONCLUDES STAFF COMMENTS, AND I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE THEM AT THIS TIME. I DO WANT TO NOTE THAT OUR REPRESENTATIVE FROM OUR BOND COUNCIL, WESTON ASSOCIATES, IS PRESENT IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. AND ALSO OUR FIRE CHIEF IS HERE AS WELL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE STATION. SO WE'RE GOING TO THE MAX. RIGHT. 7.1. YES. OKAY. NOPE. I MOVE WE APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 21 AS READ SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? 22. CONSIDER RESOLUTION NOMINATING CITY MANAGER CARRIE D NEILL JUNIOR AS A CANDIDATE FOR THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE, INTERGOVERNMENTAL RISK POOL. 
          PLACE ONE FOR A SIX YEAR TERM 2026 THROUGH 2032 I MOVE. WE APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 22 SECOND. 
          ALL IN FAVOR? CONGRATULATIONS, SIR. WE'RE GOING FROM 26 TO 23 ITEMS OF COMMUNITY INTEREST. 23 IS DISCUSSED. 23 IS DISCUSSED. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. RIGHT. WELL WE'RE HAVING TO CHANGE IT. 
          I'M HAVING TO CHANGE 23 TO 26. OKAY. SO DISCUSS. ANY THREE ITEMS OF COMMUNITY INTEREST IN 
          [REGULAR SESSION]
COUNCILMAN'S REPORTS. SECTION 551.0415 OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE. THE CITY COUNCIL, THE CITY'S ADMINISTRATION MAY REPORT INFORMATION ON THE FOLLOWING ITEMS. ONE EXPRESS. THANKS, CONGRATULATIONS OR CONDOLENCES. NUMBER TWO INFORMATION ABOUT HOLIDAY. SCHEDULE. NUMBER THREE RECOGNITION OF INDIVIDUALS. NUMBER FOUR REMINDERS ABOUT UP AND COMING CITY EVENTS. NUMBER SIX. NUMBER FIVE. ANYONE? NUMBER SIX ANNOUNCEMENTS INVOLVING AN INTIMATE THREAT TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY. I HAVE NONE, SIR. SIR. NOW WE'RE GOING TO GO TO WE'VE ALREADY DONE 24. WE'RE GOING TO 25. WHAT ABOUT 23? DO YOU WANT TO DISCUSS FUTURE 23? YEAH. SO THANK YOU, EVERYBODY FOR MIXED UP. DISCUSS FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. 
          [01:35:07]
I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE HIGHLAND DRIVE MATTER DISCUSSED IN FUTURE AGENDA PLEASE. ANYONE ELSE? WHAT ABOUT WHAT WE JUST DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE? THAT'S THE NEXT ITEM. OKAY. THE NUMBERS HAVE BEEN OKAY. YEAH. THIS. 25 I THINK ITEM 24. THANK YOU. WE'RE GOING BACK TO EXECUTIVE SESSION. NO, NO, JUST ANY, ANY ACTION AS A RESULT ON ITEM 24, THE ACTION OF ANY RESULT. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE DISCUSSION RELATED TO ITEM 24 IN EXECUTIVE SESSION AS TO REGARDING THE CITY RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION OR CITY OF SEAGOVILLE AND AND APPROVE EXECUTION OF THE AGREEMENT. APPROVE EXECUTION OF THE AGREEMENT THAT WAS DISCUSSED. OKAY. NUMBER 20. ALL IN FAVOR? VERY GOOD. ANYTHING ELSE YOU'D LIKE TO DISCUSS? OKAY. WE'RE DONE. CALL ME IF YOU WANT TO JOIN. 847.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.